IP
IndiaPulse

AEPL

Small Cap

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited

Industrials

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited operates in Power Systems, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹16.19
-0.15 · -0.92%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, timing is unclear, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
37

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
73

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
pending

Technical trend unavailable.

Result consistency
weak
31

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -21% YoY · margin compression · Rev +9% YoY · +857% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹40.8 Cr+8.7%+856.6%
EBITDA₹4.2 Cr-16.6%+224.6%
Operating margin10.4%-314 bps-2016 bps
PAT₹3.1 Cr-20.5%+282.5%
PAT margin7.5%-276 bps-1127 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited operates in Power Systems, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

Trend score is pending. The candlestick chart remains available for manual review.

Technical chart

AEPLweekly · 1Y-7.7%
Latest close ₹16.19 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-2.9%
RSI
45
MACD hist
52W pos
42%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹13₹15₹17₹19₹2152H52L2026-03Vol2026-032026-042026-052026-062026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)
Not enough price history to compute a technical trend read.
Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

37U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation1/30
Growth13/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
37

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

37/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.4%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 12/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -2.8%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 1/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
47.1
PB
4.3
EV/EBITDA
30.2
ROE
9.7%
ROCE
12.9%
FCF Yield
3.4%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-2.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
37
Previous: 37
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-2.8%
Previous: -4.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
40
40
34
34
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
73Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 73rd percentile of the scored universe and 70th percentile within Industrials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 31/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 72.5%. Key concern: 4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
73rd percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 70th pctile, median 68 · Small: 77th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
31
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 72.5%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 2.8%.
  • Debt/equity is 0.02.

Trust risks

  • 4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 34.6%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹5.45
-197.1% MoS
DCF Fair PE
45.0
DCF Fair Value
₹15.75
-2.8% MoS
PEG
2.31

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
47.10
P/B
4.32
EV/EBITDA
30.16
Market Cap
410.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
9.65%
ROCE
12.90%
ROA
6.12%
Dividend Y
0.03%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
26.00%
EPS 5Y
26.00%
Revenue 3Y
11.00%
EPS 3Y
12.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
59.29×
Altman Z
6.95
Book Value
3.77

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.42%
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
15.02 Cr
EPS TTM
0.35

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
72.45%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
22%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.