IP
IndiaPulse

ANURAS

Large Cap

Anupam Rasayan India Limited

Industrials

Anupam Rasayan India Limited is acquiring Bliss GVS Pharma, a pharmaceutical formulations company incorporated in 1984. Bliss GVS Pharma manufactures branded formulations across 50+ therapeutic segments, has 6 manufacturing facilities in Maharashtra, and is known for its WHO-endorsed anti-malarial brand Lonart.

₹1,267.2
-34.80 · -2.67%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals09 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is a red flag, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
28

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
42

medium confidence · 4/14 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
56

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
74

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT -11% YoY · margin compression · Rev +27% YoY · +24% QoQ

Filed 23 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹636 Cr+27.2%+24.2%
EBITDA₹137 Cr-4.9%+7.9%
Operating margin22.0%-700 bps-300 bps
PAT₹56 Cr-11.1%-8.2%
PAT margin8.8%-379 bps-310 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T16:24:00.786Z
Management commentary snapshot

Anupam Rasayan India Limited announces the acquisition of Bliss GVS Pharma Limited, a pharmaceutical formulations company, through a controlling stake and open offer.

The acquisition of Bliss GVS Pharma expands ANURAS's presence into pharmaceutical formulations, leveraging Bliss GVS's established brands, global accreditations, and manufacturing facilities. It offers synergies in therapeutic areas and potential for CDMO business expansion, with significant headroom for capacity utilization improvement.

Growth engines

Capacity Utilization Ramp Up

Significant headroom available to improve capacity utilization (current 30%), supported by customer engagements and increasing demand.

Expansion into CDMO Business

Expanding into regulated markets through the Vevoor facility.

Expanding USA Footprint

Leveraging Anupam's expertise in North America and European markets to expand in regulated markets.

Synergies with Therapeutic Areas

Expansion into Cardiovascular, Antidiabetic, Antibiotics, Analgesic & Anti-inflammatory, Anti-Retrovirals, Antifungals, Anti-depressant and Anti-malarial segments.

Capacity and execution

Installed Capacity (Bliss GVS Pharma)

4,822 mn units across Ambernath (758 mn), Vevoor (3,974 mn), Palghar (90 mn).

Ongoing Capex - Halol Facility

Capex of Rs. 250 crore for Halol Facility.

Executed Capex Projects

Vevoor Plant Capex: Rs. 260 crore; Palghar Suppositories Plant Capex: Rs. 50 crore; Vevoor Ointment Facility Plant Capex: Rs. 40 crore (awaiting plant approval).

Tailwinds

Global Accreditations

Bliss GVS Pharma has US FDA, EU GMP, FDA Russia, Health Canada, TGA Australia, WHO GMP approvals.

Strategic Agreements & Approvals

Signed strategic agreements in USA and Canada, received US FDA approval for Palghar suppository unit.

Robust Product Pipeline

Robust pipeline of 62+ molecules, with 48+ molecules catering to regulated markets, strengthening presence in high-entry-barrier segments.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Dec 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The document presents Bliss GVS Pharma's financial performance (Revenue, EBITDA, PAT) over multiple fiscal years (FY23-FY26), indicating a focus on annual trends and growth trajectory for the acquired entity.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue (Bliss GVS Pharma)

FY26 Revenue was Rs. 927 crore (FY25: Rs. 810 crore, FY24: Rs. 770 crore, FY23: Rs. 752 crore).

EBITDA (Bliss GVS Pharma)

FY26 EBITDA was Rs. 164 crore (FY25: Rs. 127 crore, FY24: Rs. 151 crore, FY23: Rs. 117 crore).

PAT (Bliss GVS Pharma)

FY26 PAT was Rs. 135 crore (FY25: Rs. 90 crore, FY24: Rs. 82 crore, FY23: Rs. 77 crore).

Cash & Cash Equivalents (Bliss GVS Pharma)

Rs. 167 Crores as on 31st March 2026.

Management forward view

Revenue Growth Contribution

US FDA approval for Palghar suppository unit is expected to significantly contribute to revenue growth.

Post Capex Execution Outcomes

Expects entry into regulated market, diversified dosage capabilities, and enhanced manufacturing footprint post capex execution.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Capacity Utilization (Bliss GVS Pharma)30%Ramp-up supported by customer engagements and increasing demand across key business segments.
Halol Facility CapexRs. 250 crore ongoingCommissioning timelines and the facility's contribution to regulated market entry and diversified dosage capabilities.
Revenue Contribution from Palghar Suppository UnitImplied minimal/zero post US FDA approvalSignificant contribution to overall revenue growth as stated by management.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
capex timelinenot yet verifiablequantified

Anupam Rasayan will invest a maximum of around $40 million through a combination of internal accruals and debt for the acquisition.

Timeframe: post-acquisitionDirection: stable
margin outlookfailedquantified

EBITDA growth of 20% to 25% for Jayhawk should be achieved over a three to four year period.

Timeframe: three to four year periodDirection: growth

Outcome check: OPM moved from 25.0% to average 22.0% (-3.0 pp).

margin outlookfailed

Management expects the Jayhawk acquisition to be EPS-accretive from day one.

Timeframe: from day one / post-closing in January 2026Direction: positive

Outcome check: OPM moved from 25.0% to average 22.0% (-3.0 pp).

margin outlookcontradicted

Management believes there will be no effective margin dilution from the acquisition over the next two to three years.

Timeframe: next two to three yearsDirection: stable

Outcome check: OPM moved from 25.0% to average 22.0% (-3.0 pp).

project executionnot yet verifiable

The closing of the Jayhawk acquisition transaction is expected to occur in the second half of January 2026.

Timeframe: second half of JanuaryDirection: completion
revenue outlookdelivered

Management expects a significant increase in revenue from a specific active ingredient (AI) molecule in FY27 in terms of both volume and growth.

Timeframe: FY27Direction: increase

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 27.2% across 1 later quarter(s).

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

56Neutral

SMA20 +4.7% / mo

Stock trend: 59
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

ANURASdaily · 3Y+17.8%
Latest close ₹1267.20 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-1.9%
RSI
34
MACD hist
-10.29
52W pos
58%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹1.0k₹1.1k₹1.2k₹1.3k₹1.4k52H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 34. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 rising (~1.1% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 10% off 52W high · 20% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

28U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth14/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
28

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

28/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Growth contributes 14/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -88.5%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 1/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
85.4
PB
4.3
EV/EBITDA
24.6
ROE
5.5%
ROCE
7.4%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-88.5%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
28
Previous: 28
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-88.5%
Previous: -92.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
26
26
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
42Weak Trust · medium confidenceClaim-tested Trust

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Management has 25% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 4 checked claims, with 3 adverse claim outcomes. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 1st percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 28/100.

Low Trust: 4/14 extracted management claims have outcome checks; 25% were fully delivered and 0 were partially delivered. 3 claim(s) were contradicted or failed. Key concern: 3/4 matched management claims were contradicted or failed.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
43 concalls · 4/14 claims matched
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
1st percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 1st pctile, median 68 · Large: 1st pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Early sample

4/14 claims checked. Use as directional, not final.

Claim delivery
25% delivered or partly delivered

4/14 claims checked · 3 contradicted/failed claims

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · medium confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using management claims matched with later outcomes.
Confidence
Useful directional evidence exists, but still verify the latest filings.
Investor use
Do not rely on management narrative unless hard turnaround evidence is visible.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
28
weak · capital discipline
Results
74
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 59.1%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • 3/4 matched management claims were contradicted or failed.
  • Promoter holding fell 2.1%.
  • Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • ROCE is low at 7.4%.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹313.83
-303.8% MoS
DCF Fair PE
45.0
DCF Fair Value
₹672.3
-88.5% MoS
PEG
4.49

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
85.40
P/B
4.32
EV/EBITDA
24.65
Market Cap
14523.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.50%
ROCE
7.36%
ROA
2.77%
Dividend Y
0.06%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
24.00%
EPS 5Y
19.00%
Revenue 3Y
14.00%
EPS 3Y
-2.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.56
Interest Coverage
3.52×
Altman Z
3.08
Book Value
293.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
334.00 Cr
EPS TTM
14.94

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
59.07%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
60%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 2,365+64.6% vs prev
02365Mar 2019: 502Mar 2020: 529Mar 2021: 811Mar 2022: 1,074Mar 2023: 1,602Mar 2024: 1,475Mar 2025: 1,437Mar 2026: 2,365FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 222+38.8% vs prev
0222.0Mar 2019: 49.0Mar 2020: 53.0Mar 2021: 70.0Mar 2022: 152Mar 2023: 217Mar 2024: 167Mar 2025: 160Mar 2026: 222FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 6.7+18.7% vs prev
010.2Mar 2019: 10.2%Mar 2020: 9.4%Mar 2021: 4.5%Mar 2022: 8.8%Mar 2023: 9.2%Mar 2024: 6.0%Mar 2025: 5.6%Mar 2026: 6.7%FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.