IP
IndiaPulse

ASAHIINDIA

Large Cap

Asahi India Glass Limited

Auto

Asahi India Glass Limited operates in Glass, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹881.9
+4.50 · +0.51%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
30

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
64

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
46

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
47

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Excellent · 90/100

Rev +15% YoY · PAT +45% YoY · margin expansion · +8% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,354 Cr+14.8%+7.8%
EBITDA₹287 Cr+45.7%+14.8%
Operating margin21.0%+400 bps+100 bps
PAT₹133 Cr+44.6%+34.3%
PAT margin9.8%+202 bps+194 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Asahi India Glass Limited operates in Glass, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

46Neutral

SMA20 -8.1% / mo

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS: 52
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

ASAHIINDIAweekly · 6M-11.5%
Latest close ₹881.90 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-0.9%
RSI
48
MACD hist
11.92
52W pos
36%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹760₹841₹922₹1.0k₹1.1k52H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-122026-022026-042026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 48.

  • RSI(14) at 48 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 18% off 52W high · 14% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

30U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth14/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
30

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

30/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Growth contributes 14/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -97.7%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
63.3
PB
5.7
EV/EBITDA
20.4
ROE
10.7%
ROCE
11.8%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-97.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
30
Previous: 30
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-97.7%
Previous: -94.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
36
36
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
64Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 28th percentile within Auto. Main check: results consistency is weak at 47/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
6 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
42nd percentile

overall median 67 · Auto: 28th pctile, median 71 · Large: 22nd pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Financial-only

6 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
70
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
47
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.
  • 3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 5%.

Trust risks

  • 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Promoter holding fell 2.5%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹216.44
-307.5% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹446.16
-97.7% MoS
PEG
2.75

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
63.30
P/B
5.69
EV/EBITDA
20.42
Market Cap
22367.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
10.70%
ROCE
11.80%
ROA
4.44%
Dividend Y
0.23%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
23.00%
Revenue 3Y
7.00%
EPS 3Y
-1.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.56
Interest Coverage
4.50×
Altman Z
5.41
Book Value
154.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
502.00 Cr
EPS TTM
13.52

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
51.58%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
49%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 9.0+26.7% vs prev
09.6Mar 2026: 1.4Mar 2025: 9.0Mar 2024: 9.6Mar 2023: 7.1Mar 2022: 9.0FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.