BGRENERGY
Small CapBGR Energy Systems Limited
Power
BGR Energy Systems Limited operates in Power Projects, within the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -62% YoY · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹50 Cr | -61.5% | -35.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹-234 Cr | +22.5% | -25.1% |
| Operating margin | -467.0% | -23500 bps | -22600 bps |
| PAT | ₹-771 Cr | NDF | NDF |
| PAT margin | -1542.0% | -128662 bps | -129456 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
BGR Energy Systems Limited operates in Power Projects, within the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
44NeutralSMA20 -7.8% / mo
Technical chart
BGRENERGYweekly · 5Y+751.7%Technical trend read
NeutralTrend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 60.
- SMA20 falling (~8.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 60 — sideways, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 29% off 52W high · 263% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Growth contributes 13/25 to the score.
- Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
- Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is -1.1, in distress territory.
- Promoter pledge is 58.8%.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 6th percentile of the scored universe and 3rd percentile within Power. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 35/100.
Mixed Trust Lite: 9 years of positive FCF. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 58.8% of holding.
Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.
overall median 67 · Power: 3rd pctile, median 67 · Small: 8th pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Weak Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸9 years of positive FCF.
- ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 58.8% of holding.
- ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1857 Cr.
- ▸ROCE is low at -25%.
- ▸ROCE trend is -30.7%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- —
- P/B
- —
- EV/EBITDA
- —
- Market Cap
- 2536.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- —
- ROCE
- -26.90%
- ROA
- -29.97%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- -23.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 37.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- -28.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 85.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.00
- Interest Coverage
- -0.71×
- Altman Z
- -1.12
- Book Value
- -396.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 8/5
- OCF
- -23.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- -178.51
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 51.01%
- Promoter Pledge
- 58.80%
- Momentum 52W
- 64%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Power — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.