IP
IndiaPulse

BSOFT

Large Cap

BIRLASOFT LIMITED

IT

Birlasoft is an IT services company focused on AI-led capabilities and enterprise software. It recently onboarded new leaders and is investing in its sales team to pivot to a growth-oriented "AI First" organization amidst a challenging demand environment, aiming to return to revenue growth.

₹319.5
-4.70 · -1.45%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals09 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
62

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
72

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
43

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
36

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Good · 70/100

Rev +2% YoY · PAT +44% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 06 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,349 Cr+2.4%+0.1%
EBITDA₹249 Cr+43.1%+1.6%
Operating margin18.0%+500 bps+0 bps
PAT₹176 Cr+44.3%+46.7%
PAT margin13.1%+379 bps+415 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T16:41:46.862Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 revenue grew 0.1% QoQ (INR) but declined in USD. Full-year FY26 revenue declined 1.2% (INR) / 6% (USD). EBITDA margins expanded significantly to 18.5% in Q4 and 16.3% for FY26, driven by operational efficiencies and strategic exits. Deal signings exceeded $200M for two consecutive quarters.

Despite strong margin expansion and deal wins, Birlasoft's revenue has been flat or declining for six consecutive quarters, reflecting a challenging demand environment and client-specific issues. Management is undertaking a second restructuring with new leadership and substantial sales team expansion, betting on an "AI First" strategy to drive future growth. The success of these investments and the conversion of delayed deals are critical.

Growth engines

AI-led capabilities

Deploying AI-powered solutions like Cogito platform to accelerate enterprise software development, automate processes, and enhance decision-making.

Sales team expansion

Expect to increase sales team strength by 30-40% YoY by mid-FY27 to enhance capacity and capability, with additions in US and Europe geos.

ERP business turnaround

New leader from SAP with 25 years of experience hired to lead the ERP business, with hopes to get it back to growth.

BFSI vertical

Scaling Gen AI services across the North American P&C market; management expects BFSI to be a strong growth vertical going forward.

Capacity and execution

Sales team headcount

Sales team strength expected to go up by 30% to 40% on a year-on-year basis by the middle of FY '27.

Leadership hires

Onboarded Vikram Puranik as COO, new leaders for Data & AI practice, ERP practice, Global Partnerships & Alliances, and Lifesciences vertical.

Tailwinds

Currency tailwinds

Benefited by incremental one-offs in Q4 versus Q3, including currency tailwinds contributing 170 basis points to margin.

Tax concessions

Took the benefit of available tax concessions in some global operations in Q4, which acted as a tailwind.

Lower provisions

Lower provisions for performance-based compensation and leave encashment in Q4 contributed 170 basis points to margin.

Headwinds

Soft demand environment

Sustained macroeconomic headwinds led to some client-specific issues and erosion of revenue.

Client-specific operational issue

An operational issue at one MedTech customer affected volume growth in Q4, reflected in the Life Sciences business.

Productivity benefits from AI deals

Upfront productivity benefits had to be passed on because of AI deals won, denting revenue.

Non-profitable revenue streams

Bold decisions to walk away from several non-profitable revenue streams affected overall revenue but contributed to margin expansion.

Risk radar

Market volatility

The demand environment is challenging, marked by uncertainty, making future predictions difficult.

Execution risk of new hires

Success depends on new leaders and expanded sales team settling down, building pipeline, and converting orders.

Competitive intensity

Larger players are now competing for mid-sized deals due to AI creating a level playing field.

Revenue deflation from AI deals

Outcome-based, fixed-price AI deals can lead to immediate revenue deflation, with revenue catching up in future quarters.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

QoQ is crucial to track sequential momentum, especially with new investments and deal conversions. YoY is important for full-year performance and margin expansion context, but the company's recent performance issues make QoQ more indicative of immediate trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue (Q4 FY26)

INR 13,486 million (0.1% QoQ, 2.4% YoY); $145.3 million (-3.7% QoQ CC, USD)

Revenue (FY26)

INR 53,100 million (-1.2% YoY); $597.5 million (-6% YoY USD)

EBITDA Margin (Q4 FY26)

18.5% (+30 bps QoQ)

EBITDA Margin (FY26)

16.3% (+333 bps YoY from 13% in FY25)

Management forward view

Focus on sales, pipeline, order booking

Entire focus going forward will be centered around sales, pipeline generation, and order booking, especially for outcome-based and managed services engagements.

"AI First" organization

Intent to pivot to a growth-oriented "AI First" organization with significant changes in delivery mechanism, expecting benefits over the next couple of quarters.

ERP business improvement

Management strongly believes the ERP business will only continue to improve from here with the new leader.

Sustained cash flow generation

Committed to staying focused on sustained cash flow generation and prudent capital allocation.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Revenue growth6 consecutive quarters of flat/declining QoQ revenue.Resumption of quarter-on-quarter revenue growth, indicating effectiveness of new investments.
Order booking (TCV)$208M in Q4, second consecutive quarter above $200M.Sustained strong order booking performance, substantially better than FY26, to build future revenue pipeline.
Sales team ramp-up effectiveness30-40% increase in sellers expected by mid-FY27.Tangible improvement in pipeline generation and TCV conversion from new sales hires.
EBITDA margin18.5% in Q4 FY26.Maintenance of steady-state EBITDA margins upward of 15% despite growth investments and one-off reversals.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

43Neutral

SMA20 -16.2% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 48
Sector 3M: -0.2% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

BSOFTdaily · 6M-24.5%
Latest close ₹319.35 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-2.1%
RSI
41
MACD hist
1.21
52W pos
8%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹298₹344₹390₹436₹48252H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-122026-012026-032026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 41.

  • SMA20 falling (~15.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

62U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation17/30
Growth13/25
Quality6/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
62

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

62/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.8%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 60.1%.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 6/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 13/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 17/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins

Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.

IT PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA relative to revenue growth, margins, and cash conversion.
Secondary checks
Deal pipeline, attrition, dollar revenue growth, FCF yield.
Main risk check
Low PE can reflect weak growth or margin pressure.
PE
16.4
PB
2.2
EV/EBITDA
9.6
ROE
14.4%
ROCE
21.6%
FCF Yield
3.8%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+60.1%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
62
Previous: 62
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+60.1%
Previous: +59.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
62
59
62
62
58
61
62
62
62
62
62
62

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
72Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 70th percentile of the scored universe and 64th percentile within IT. Main check: results consistency is weak at 36/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: ROCE trend is -2.7%.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
81 docs indexed · 45 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
70th percentile

overall median 67 · IT: 64th pctile, median 68 · Large: 47th pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Financial-only

81 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
64
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
36
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 3.7%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.03.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -2.7%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹247.7
-29.0% MoS
DCF Fair PE
43.2
DCF Fair Value
₹801.36
+60.1% MoS
PEG
1.15

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
16.40
P/B
2.17
EV/EBITDA
9.58
Market Cap
8918.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.40%
ROCE
21.60%
ROA
9.84%
Dividend Y
2.04%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
8.00%
EPS 5Y
11.00%
Revenue 3Y
3.00%
EPS 3Y
19.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.03
Interest Coverage
43.30×
Altman Z
7.55
Book Value
147.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.79%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
481.00 Cr
EPS TTM
18.55

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
40.39%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
8%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.