IP
IndiaPulse

CANBK

Large Cap

Canara Bank

Financial Services

Canara Bank is an Indian public sector bank offering a wide range of banking and financial services. It reported global business of INR 28.06 lakh crore and global advances of INR 12.37 lakh crore for FY26, with a focus on RAM credit and improving asset quality.

₹137.8
+5.89 · +4.47%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
72

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
70

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
42

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
67

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -10% YoY · Rev +1% YoY

Filed 11 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹31,839 Cr+1.1%+2.9%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹4,575 Cr-10.5%-11.6%
PAT margin14.4%-186 bps-235 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T16:43:30.917Z
Management commentary snapshot

Canara Bank reported strong annual profit growth and improved asset quality for FY26, with Net Profit up 12.69% YoY and GNPA declining to 1.84%. However, Q4 performance saw a significant drop in non-interest income and net profit QoQ and YoY.

While annual results show robust growth in advances and improved asset quality, the sharp decline in Q4 non-interest income, operating profit, and net profit, coupled with an increase in fresh slippages QoQ, raises concerns about earnings stability and underlying business momentum. The bank's ability to sustain asset quality improvement amidst rising slippages and manage non-core income volatility will be key.

Current business mix

Advances Mix (Mar'26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail24.0%
Agriculture & Allied22.0%
MSME13.0%
Corporate & Others41.0%
Growth engines

Retail Credit Growth

Retail credit grew 32.93% YoY to INR 2,96,912 crore.

RAM Credit Focus

RAM credit grew 19.73% YoY to INR 7,30,520 crore, comprising 59% of advances.

NBFC Credit

NBFC credit grew 14.02% YoY to INR 1,57,478 crore.

Construction Sector Credit

Construction credit grew 32.88% YoY to INR 11,360 crore.

Tailwinds

Strong Capital Position

CRAR at 17.04% and Common Equity at 12.44% provide capital for growth.

Improved Asset Quality

Significant YoY decline in GNPA to 1.84% and NNPA to 0.43%, with PCR at 94.21%.

Priority Sector Compliance

Exceeded all mandated norms for priority sector lending, including total priority (43.71% vs 40% norm) and agriculture (19.52% vs 18% norm).

Headwinds

Q4 Non-Interest Income Decline

Non-interest income fell 38.94% QoQ and 24.04% YoY in Q4, driven by sharp drops in treasury income and profit on sale of investments.

Q4 Profitability Pressure

Q4 Operating Profit declined 25.89% QoQ and 18.42% YoY, and Net Profit fell 12.59% QoQ and 9.95% YoY.

Rising Slippages

Fresh slippages increased to INR 2,771 crore in Q4 from INR 1,857 crore in Q3.

Declining Yields

Yield on Advances declined to 8.29% in Q4 from 8.34% in Q3 and 8.83% in Q4 FY25.

Risk radar

Asset Quality Volatility

Despite overall improvement, Q4 saw an increase in fresh slippages and high GNPA in MSME (4.64%) and Food Processing (6.93%).

Non-Core Income Dependence

Significant drop in treasury income and profit on sale of investments highlights sensitivity to market conditions.

Infrastructure Credit Decline

Infrastructure credit declined 7.86% YoY and 6.46% QoQ to INR 1,28,239 crore.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

For financial services, YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall annual growth and structural changes in asset quality and profitability. QoQ comparison is vital for tracking sequential momentum in business growth, NIM trends, and immediate asset quality developments like slippages and provisions, which can be volatile.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM growth

Global Advances grew 15.30% YoY to INR 12,37,548 crore.

NIM

Q4 NIM was 2.54%, up from 2.45% QoQ but down from 2.73% YoY.

Borrowing cost

Cost of Funds declined to 5.09% in Q4 from 5.18% in Q3 and 5.28% in Q4 FY25.

GNPA

Gross NPA declined to 1.84% in Q4 FY26 from 2.94% in Q4 FY25.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Net Interest Margin (NIM)2.54% (Q4 FY26)Stability or improvement in NIM, given declining yields on advances and funds.
Fresh SlippagesINR 2,771 crore (Q4 FY26)Trend in fresh slippages to assess underlying asset quality and future credit costs.
Non-Interest IncomeINR 4,824 crore (Q4 FY26)Recovery and stability in non-interest income, especially treasury and investment-related gains.
RAM Credit Growth19.73% YoYContinued strong growth in RAM segments, particularly Retail and MSME, to drive overall advances.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

42Neutral

SMA20 -6.4% / mo

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS:

Technical chart

CANBKweekly · 1Y+23.4%
Latest close ₹137.51 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+2.0%
RSI
55
MACD hist
1.16
52W pos
57%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹101₹117₹133₹150₹16652H52L2025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2025-062025-092025-122026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 55. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~6.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 55 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 16% off 52W high · 33% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

72U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation30/30
Growth16/25
Quality7/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
72

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

72/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.4%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 78.8%.
  • Valuation contributes 30/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 7/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 9/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Bank valuation: P/B adjusted for ROE and asset quality

Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.

Bank P/B
Primary lens
Price/book and ROE/ROA, not trailing PE alone.
Secondary checks
Capital adequacy, credit cost, NPA trend, deposit franchise.
Main risk check
Low P/B can be a trap if asset quality or credit cost is worsening.
PE
6.7
PB
1.0
EV/EBITDA
297.2
ROE
16.1%
ROCE
6.5%
FCF Yield
4.4%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+78.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
72
Previous: 72
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+78.8%
Previous: +79.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
70Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 64th percentile of the scored universe and 81st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 56/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 62.9%. Key concern: Altman Z is 1.69.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
123 docs indexed · 45 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
64th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 81st pctile, median 62 · Large: 39th pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Financial-only

123 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
62
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
56
watch · capital discipline
Results
67
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 62.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4.4%.
  • 8 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Altman Z is 1.69.
  • ROCE is low at 6.5%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹240.05
+42.6% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹650.1
+78.8% MoS
PEG
0.20

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
6.67
P/B
1.02
EV/EBITDA
297.23
Market Cap
119651.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.10%
ROCE
6.52%
ROA
1.04%
Dividend Y
3.18%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
12.00%
EPS 5Y
44.00%
Revenue 3Y
14.00%
EPS 3Y
18.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.10
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.69
Book Value
130.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
4.38%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
7942.00 Cr
EPS TTM
19.70

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
62.93%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
47%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 85.9k-16.7% vs prev
0153kMar 2026: 153.2kMar 2025: 142.2kMar 2024: 127.7kMar 2023: 103.2kMar 2022: 85.9kFY26FY25FY24FY23FY22

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 5,678-46.4% vs prev
019kMar 2026: 19.2kMar 2025: 17.0kMar 2024: 14.6kMar 2023: 10.6kMar 2022: 5,678FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
PNB
Large
Punjab National Bank
Banking
match 164
68
6.6
13.0%
+80%
UNDERVALUED
UNIONBANK
Large
Union Bank of India
Banking
match 163
65
6.5
15.7%
+80%
UNDERVALUED
BANKBARODA
Large
Bank of Baroda
Banking
match 162
68
6.8
12.7%
+80%
UNDERVALUED
BANKINDIA
Large
Bank of India
Banking
match 159
68
6.0
12.4%
+81%
UNDERVALUED
IOB
Large
Indian Overseas Bank
Banking
match 159
68
11.6
15.6%
+65%
UNDERVALUED
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.