IP
IndiaPulse

CERA

Micro Cap

Cera Sanitaryware Limited

Industrials

Cera Sanitaryware Limited is a premier Indian sanitaryware company with a pan-India reach and deep retail penetration. It operates a multi-layered distribution ecosystem, supported by in-house manufacturing and process excellence. The company maintains a debt-free balance sheet with healthy cash reserves and offers a portfolio spanning value to premium segments across sanitaryware and bathware categories.

₹5,835
+362.00 · +6.61%
Quote09 Jun, 12:00 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
46

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
74

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
56

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
67

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -10% YoY · margin compression · Rev +11% YoY · +29% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹644 Cr+11.4%+29.1%
EBITDA₹98 Cr-7.5%+92.2%
Operating margin15.0%-300 bps+500 bps
PAT₹77 Cr-10.5%+220.8%
PAT margin12.0%-292 bps+715 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-08T07:55:41.450Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 revenue grew 7.1% YoY to Rs. 2,050 Cr, but EBITDA declined 8.8% YoY to Rs. 322 Cr and PAT fell 17.1% YoY to Rs. 204 Cr, indicating significant margin pressure. Q4 FY26 showed strong sequential recovery in income and profitability.

While revenue growth is positive, the substantial decline in full-year profitability and margins for FY26 raises concerns about cost management and pricing power. The strong Q4 sequential recovery is encouraging, but it needs to be sustained to reverse the annual trend and alleviate margin pressure.

Growth engines

Retail and Distribution Expansion

Expansion through Style Centres, Galleries & network expansion to deepen market penetration.

Premiumization Strategy

Focus on premiumization through Senator & CERA Luxe brands.

Core Brand Strength

Continued strength of the core CERA brand across retail and project segments.

Value Segment Scaling

Scaling presence in the value segment through Polipluz, targeting rural and semi-urban markets.

Capacity and execution

CERA Style Centres (CSCs)

Over 1,400 CERA Style Centres (retailer-owned units) planned over the next 3–4 years to enhance last-mile brand presence.

Tailwinds

Rising Housing Demand

Structural industry tailwind from rising housing demand & real estate activity.

Preference for Organized Players

Increasing preference for branded and organized players in the market.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Annual (YoY) results provide an overview of the full fiscal year's performance and overall trends, while quarterly (QoQ) comparisons highlight recent sequential momentum, particularly important for assessing recovery and execution in the industrials sector.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue

FY26 Revenue at Rs. 2,050 Cr (up 7.1% YoY). Q4 FY26 Total Income at Rs. 650 Cr (up 9.4% YoY, 27.5% QoQ).

EBITDA

FY26 EBITDA at Rs. 322 Cr (down 8.8% YoY). Q4 FY26 EBITDA at Rs. 104 Cr (down 14.0% YoY, up 67.7% QoQ).

PAT

FY26 PAT at Rs. 204 Cr (down 17.1% YoY). Q4 FY26 PAT at Rs. 77 Cr (down 10.5% YoY, up 220.8% QoQ).

EBITDA Margins

FY26 EBITDA Margins at 15.3% (vs 17.8% in FY25). Q4 FY26 EBITDA Margins at 16.0% (vs 20.4% in Q4 FY25, 12.2% in Q3 FY26).

Management forward view

Positioned for Sustainable Growth

Structural industry tailwinds, supported by focused execution across segments, position CERA for sustained and scalable growth.

Value Segment Opportunity

Polipluz is well-positioned to capture scalable growth opportunities across underpenetrated markets.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Revenue GrowthFY26 Revenue up 7.1% YoY.Sustained double-digit revenue growth in subsequent quarters.
EBITDA MarginsFY26 EBITDA margin 15.3%; Q4 FY26 EBITDA margin 16.0%.Consistent improvement in EBITDA margins towards historical levels (e.g., FY25 17.8%).
PAT GrowthFY26 PAT down 17.1% YoY.Return to positive PAT growth on a year-on-year basis.
CERA Style Centres (CSCs) Expansion1,613 CERA Style Centres.Progress and execution of the plan to add over 1,400 CSCs in the next 3-4 years.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

56Neutral

SMA20 +10.0% / mo

Stock trend: 59
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

CERAweekly · 3Y-17.3%
Latest close ₹5835.00 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+7.8%
RSI
60
MACD hist
13.47
52W pos
52%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹4.3k₹5.2k₹6.2k₹7.1k₹8.1k52H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term trend unclear. RSI 60.

  • SMA20 rising (~9.1% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 60 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 18% off 52W high · 31% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

46U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation5/30
Growth12/25
Quality8/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
46

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

46/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 18.1%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 8/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 12/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
33.6
PB
4.8
EV/EBITDA
23.1
ROE
14.9%
ROCE
19.3%
FCF Yield
1.8%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+18.1%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
46
Previous: 46
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+18.1%
Previous: +23.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
45
45
46
56
56
56
46
46
46
46
46
46

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
74Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 76th percentile of the scored universe and 72nd percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 50/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: ROCE trend is -2.7%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
76th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 72nd pctile, median 68 · Micro: 64th pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
50
watch · capital discipline
Results
67
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.7%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.03.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -2.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹2,016.94
-189.3% MoS
DCF Fair PE
45.0
DCF Fair Value
₹7,124.4
+18.1% MoS
PEG
2.10

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
33.60
P/B
4.79
EV/EBITDA
23.08
Market Cap
7063.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.90%
ROCE
19.30%
ROA
11.08%
Dividend Y
1.37%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
11.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
-0.60%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.03
Interest Coverage
44.83×
Altman Z
8.90
Book Value
1142.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.76%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
212.00 Cr
EPS TTM
158.32

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
54.41%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
36%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.