CIEINDIA
Micro CapCIE Automotive India Limited
Auto
CIE Automotive India Limited (CIEINDIA) is an Indian auto ancillary company. This document reports on an investor conference held on May 21, 2026, where discussions clarified previously released investor presentations for Q1CY2026 and Q4FullYearCY2025, with no UPSI shared.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Mixed fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 57/100Rev +15% YoY · PAT +21% YoY · +9% QoQ · operating leverage · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,612 Cr | +14.9% | +9.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹402 Cr | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Operating margin | 15.0% | +0 bps | +100 bps |
| PAT | ₹249 Cr | +20.9% | +22.1% |
| PAT margin | 9.5% | +47 bps | +101 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Where growth can come from, and what can break the case
The investor meet outcome document did not disclose any new financial or operational results, focusing instead on clarifications of previously published investor presentations.
This document provides no new information to assess the company's performance or investment thesis. Discussions were limited to clarifications of previously published investor presentations, indicating no material changes or updates.
What management said, and what results must prove
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
The provided document is an administrative update on an investor meet and does not contain any financial or operational results, thus a relevant comparison basis cannot be established.
Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trend score and candlestick chart
55NeutralSMA20 +6.7% / mo
Technical chart
CIEINDIAweekly · 6M+10.0%Technical trend read
NeutralTrend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 49.
- RSI(14) at 49 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 16% off 52W high · 15% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
FAIR VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 41.9%.
- Balance sheet contributes 14/15 to the score.
Main drags
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Valuation is weaker at 13/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 6/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium
Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 79th percentile of the scored universe and 63rd percentile within Auto. Main check: results consistency is weak at 49/100.
High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 65.7%. Key concern: 2 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · Auto: 63rd pctile, median 71 · Micro: 68th pctile, median 71
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 65.7%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 2.6%.
- ▸10 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸2 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 19.20
- P/B
- 2.22
- EV/EBITDA
- 9.49
- Market Cap
- 16612.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 11.80%
- ROCE
- 14.70%
- ROA
- 8.11%
- Dividend Y
- 1.60%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 9.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 54.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 2.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 127.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.06
- Interest Coverage
- 62.13×
- Altman Z
- 5.56
- Book Value
- 197.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 2.75%
- FCF Positive Y
- 10/5
- OCF
- 1258.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 22.97
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 65.70%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 39%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Auto — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.