IP
IndiaPulse

CMPDI

Small Cap

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited

Services

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited operates in Mining Consultancy, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹244.24
+9.49 · +4.04%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is supportive, timing is unclear, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
58

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
78

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
pending

Technical trend unavailable.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 30/100

YoY data unavailable — classification deferred

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹827 CrNDF+56.3%
EBITDA₹238 Cr-28.5%+8.2%
Operating margin29.0%-1600 bps-1300 bps
PAT₹188 CrNDF+8.7%
PAT margin22.7%-1470 bps-997 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited operates in Mining Consultancy, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

Trend score is pending. The candlestick chart remains available for manual review.

Technical chart

CMPDIweekly · 5Y+56.5%
Latest close ₹244.18 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+5.0%
RSI
77
MACD hist
52W pos
83%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹144₹176₹207₹238₹26952H52LVol2026-042026-052026-052026-062026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)
Not enough price history to compute a technical trend read.
Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

58U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation4/30
Growth17/25
Quality15/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
58

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

58/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.3%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 21.0%.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 9/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 17/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
27.3
PB
7.3
EV/EBITDA
20.6
ROE
28.4%
ROCE
38.1%
FCF Yield
3.3%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+21.0%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
58
Previous: 58
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+21.0%
Previous: +23.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
58
60
60
58
58
60
60
60
58
58
58
58

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
78Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 87th percentile of the scored universe and 93rd percentile within Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 55/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 85%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -8.2%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
87th percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 93rd pctile, median 66 · Small: 90th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
80
strong · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 85%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 3.3%.
  • 6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -8.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹78.64
-210.6% MoS
DCF Fair PE
36.0
DCF Fair Value
₹309.24
+21.0% MoS
PEG
1.42

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
27.30
P/B
7.34
EV/EBITDA
20.61
Market Cap
16753.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
28.40%
ROCE
38.10%
ROA
18.81%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
9.00%
EPS 5Y
14.00%
Revenue 3Y
19.00%
EPS 3Y
27.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
8.67
Book Value
32.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.31%
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
716.00 Cr
EPS TTM
8.59

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
85.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
75%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 2,317+10.2% vs prev
02317Mar 2021: 1,489Mar 2022: 1,208Mar 2023: 1,386Mar 2024: 1,733Mar 2025: 2,103Mar 2026: 2,317FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 613-8.1% vs prev
0667.0Mar 2021: 317Mar 2022: 282Mar 2023: 297Mar 2024: 503Mar 2025: 667Mar 2026: 613FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 26.9-17.8% vs prev
039.5Mar 2021: 39.5%Mar 2022: 27.8%Mar 2023: 24.0%Mar 2024: 31.6%Mar 2025: 32.7%Mar 2026: 26.9%FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.