IP
IndiaPulse

CRAMC

Micro Cap

Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited

Financial Services

Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited (CRAMC) provides asset management services to schemes of Canara Robeco Mutual Fund and advisory services to clients. The company aims for 'Inspired Investing for every Indian household'.

₹246.5
+4.71 · +1.95%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:16 pm · v4.2-autoheal
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
70

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
80

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
42

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -2% YoY · margin compression · Rev +3% YoY

Filed 27 Apr 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹104 Cr+3.0%-14.1%
EBITDA₹60 Cr+0.0%-17.8%
Operating margin58.0%-100 bps-200 bps
PAT₹41 Cr-2.4%-22.6%
PAT margin39.4%-216 bps-438 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-08T08:08:31.592Z
Management commentary snapshot

CRAMC reports Q4 FY26 Revenue from Operations up 13% YoY and Operating Profit from Core AMC Business up 17% YoY. However, PAT declined 1% YoY and 22% QoQ, impacted by negative fair value changes and higher other expenses.

CRAMC demonstrated strong operational growth in Q4 FY26 with robust AUM and core operating profit expansion. While PAT saw a decline due to specific financial items and increased expenses, the underlying business momentum, supported by digital adoption and distribution network growth, appears stable.

Current business mix

MAAUM by Distributor Segment (Mar 2026)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Banks11.0%
Mutual Fund Distributors33.0%
National Distributors28.0%
Direct28.0%
Growth engines

Digital Ecosystem Growth

User sessions on digital platforms grew 200% YoY in Q4 FY26 to 1.9 million, with engagement rates increasing by 28.07% YoY to 73.1%.

AUM Expansion

Quarterly Average AUM (QAAUM) increased 13.7% YoY to ₹1,175 Billion as of Mar'26.

Distribution Network Expansion

Number of distributors increased to 56,231 in Mar'26 from 50,935 in Mar'25.

Capacity and execution

Branch Network Expansion

Number of branches increased to 29 as of Mar'26 from 23 in Mar'25.

Distributor Base Growth

Number of distributors increased to 56,231 as of Mar'26 from 50,935 in Mar'25.

Tailwinds

Digital Adoption and Engagement

Significant growth in user sessions (+200% YoY) and engagement rates (+28.07% YoY) on digital platforms indicates strong digital channel traction.

Industry SIP Growth

The mutual fund industry saw SIP monthly flows grow 23.9% YoY to ₹321 Billion in Mar'26, indicating a supportive market environment.

Headwinds

Negative Fair Value Changes

The company recorded a net loss on fair value changes of -₹106 Million in Q4 FY26, impacting total income and PAT.

Decline in SIP Metrics

CRAMC's SIP monthly contribution and outstanding SIP accounts declined QoQ in Mar'26, contrary to industry trends.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

For financial services, both YoY and QoQ comparisons are crucial. YoY reflects long-term AUM growth and structural changes, while QoQ captures sequential momentum in flows, profitability, and operational efficiency, which are vital for an AMC.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Quarterly Average AUM (QAAUM)

₹1,175 Billion for Q4 FY26, up 13.7% YoY.

Equity QAAUM

₹1,069 Billion for Q4 FY26, up from ₹948 Billion in Mar'25.

SIP Monthly Contribution

₹7.27 Billion for Mar'26, down from ₹7.55 Billion in Dec'25.

Outstanding SIP Accounts

2.04 Million as of Mar'26, down from 2.10 Million in Dec'25.

Management forward view

Enhanced Digital Payment Experience

Management integrated CAMS Pay as a new payment aggregator and implemented UPI Intent Flow via Bill Desk 2.0.

Impact of New Labour Codes

The estimated impact of the New Labour Codes has been recognized in employee benefit expense and is not expected to be material.

ESOP Grant

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee approved a grant of 14,55,109 stock options to eligible employees on January 20, 2026.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
AUM Growth (QAAUM)₹1,175 Billion (+13.7% YoY)Sustained double-digit YoY growth in QAAUM, particularly in equity segments.
SIP Monthly Contribution₹7.27 Billion (Mar'26)Reversal of QoQ decline and alignment with, or outperformance of, industry SIP growth rates.
Digital Engagement1.9 million user sessions (Q4 FY26)Continued high growth in user sessions and engagement rates on digital platforms.
Profit After Tax (PAT)₹414 Million (Q4 FY26)Stabilization and growth in PAT, reflecting the strong operating profit from the core AMC business.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

42Neutral

SMA20 -7.9% / mo

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS:

Technical chart

CRAMCweekly · 3Y-19.5%
Latest close ₹245.23 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+0.1%
RSI
46
MACD hist
2.82
52W pos
25%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹208₹242₹277₹311₹34552H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-102026-012026-032026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 46.

  • SMA20 falling (~8.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 46 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 28% off 52W high · 14% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

70U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation6/30
Growth24/25
Quality16/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
70

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

70/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 26.9%.
  • Growth contributes 24/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 6/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 7/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 16/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
23.7
PB
6.5
EV/EBITDA
16.7
ROE
30.3%
ROCE
40.1%
FCF Yield
1.3%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+26.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-autoheal
Final score
70
Previous: 71 (-1)
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+26.9%
Previous: +28.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-autoheal
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
70
71

Factor attribution

Valuation
6-1
was 7
Trust Score
80Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 91st percentile of the scored universe and 96th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 55/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 75%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -5.2%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
91st percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 96th pctile, median 62 · Micro: 87th pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
80
strong · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 75%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.4%.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -5.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹92.74
-165.8% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹337.26
+26.9% MoS
PEG
0.60

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
23.70
P/B
6.47
EV/EBITDA
16.69
Market Cap
4822.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
30.30%
ROCE
40.10%
ROA
24.91%
Dividend Y
1.65%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
30.00%
EPS 5Y
41.00%
Revenue 3Y
31.00%
EPS 3Y
37.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
141.50×
Altman Z
8.96
Book Value
37.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.33%
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
172.00 Cr
EPS TTM
10.22

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
20%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 319-21.1% vs prev
0454.7Mar 2026: 455Mar 2025: 404Mar 2024: 319FY26FY25FY24

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.