DRAGARWQ
Small CapDr Agarwals Eye Hospital Limited
Pharma
Dr Agarwals Eye Hospital Limited operates in Hospitals, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, timing is unclear, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Technical trend unavailable.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100PAT 0% YoY · margin compression · Rev +20% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹120 Cr | +20.0% | +3.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹34 Cr | +6.3% | +0.0% |
| Operating margin | 28.0% | -400 bps | -200 bps |
| PAT | ₹16 Cr | +0.0% | -5.9% |
| PAT margin | 13.3% | -267 bps | -133 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
Dr Agarwals Eye Hospital Limited operates in Hospitals, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
Trend score is pending. The candlestick chart remains available for manual review.
Technical chart
DRAGARWQdaily · 1Y+4.2%Technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 48.
- RSI(14) at 48 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- 18% off 52W high · 8% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
FAIR VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 18.1%.
- Growth contributes 21/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Promoter pledge is 29.3%.
- Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 5/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks
Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 57th percentile of the scored universe and 45th percentile within Pharma. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 54/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 72.7%. Key concern: Promoter pledge is elevated at 29.3%.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Pharma: 45th pctile, median 70 · Small: 62nd pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 72.7%.
- ▸8 years of positive FCF.
- ▸8/8 recent quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
- ▸7/8 recent quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoter pledge is elevated at 29.3%.
- ▸Debt/equity is 1.06.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 34.40
- P/B
- 6.96
- EV/EBITDA
- 14.34
- Market Cap
- 2412.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 25.20%
- ROCE
- 17.40%
- ROA
- 9.14%
- Dividend Y
- 0.12%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 27.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 120.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 21.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 24.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.94
- Interest Coverage
- 12.08×
- Altman Z
- 5.47
- Book Value
- 717.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 7/5
- OCF
- 145.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 145.05
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 72.67%
- Promoter Pledge
- 29.30%
- Momentum 52W
- 38%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.