HBLENGINE
Small CapHBL Engineering Limited
Industrials
HBL Engineering Limited operates in Engineering Products, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 67/100Rev +27% YoY · PAT +42% YoY · operating leverage · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹604 Cr | +26.9% | -30.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹75 Cr | -5.1% | -75.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | -500 bps | -2300 bps |
| PAT | ₹64 Cr | +42.2% | -70.9% |
| PAT margin | 10.6% | +115 bps | -1457 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
HBL Engineering Limited operates in Engineering Products, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
55NeutralSMA20 +12.2% / mo
Technical chart
HBLENGINEdaily · 1Y-21.4%Technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 48.
- SMA20 falling (~2.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 48 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- 29% off 52W high · 27% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 40.9%.
- Quality contributes 20/20 to the score.
Main drags
- Valuation is weaker at 10/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 6/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 10/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +3 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
High Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 100th percentile of the scored universe and 100th percentile within Industrials. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 59.1%. Key concern: OPM spread across recent quarters is 32%.
Management behaviour ranks as unusually reliable. Still verify valuation and cycle risk.
overall median 67 · Industrials: 100th pctile, median 68 · Small: 100th pctile, median 65
12 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
High Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 59.1%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 2.5%.
- ▸11 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 32%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 25.40
- P/B
- 9.59
- EV/EBITDA
- 18.31
- Market Cap
- 21247.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 45.30%
- ROCE
- 58.40%
- ROA
- 27.67%
- Dividend Y
- 0.26%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 29.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 118.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 34.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 105.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.03
- Interest Coverage
- 74.20×
- Altman Z
- 9.68
- Book Value
- 79.90
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 2.47%
- FCF Positive Y
- 11/5
- OCF
- 738.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 29.40
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 59.11%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 38%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.