IP
IndiaPulse

IRFC

Large Cap

Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited

Financial Services

IRFC is registered with RBI as a systemically important NBFC-ND-IFC, majorly owned by GoI through MoR. It is the dedicated market borrowing arm for Indian Railways, financing rolling stock, leasing railway infrastructure, and lending to other MoR entities.

₹96.02
+1.32 · +1.39%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals06 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
25

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
51

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
41

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
75

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 40/100

Rev +9% YoY · PAT +0% YoY · +10% QoQ

Filed 14 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹7,336 Cr+9.1%+10.1%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹1,684 Cr+0.1%-6.5%
PAT margin23.0%-206 bps-409 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T17:52:52.303Z
Management commentary snapshot

IRFC reported a 7.80% YoY increase in PAT to INR 7,009.17 Cr for FY25-26, with Revenue from Operations up 0.49% to INR 27,284.15 Cr. AUM grew 5.34% to INR 4,84,616.77 Cr, and NIM stood at 1.50%.

IRFC maintains its strategic role as the dedicated financier for Indian Railways, demonstrating consistent financial performance with strong asset quality (NIL GNPA). Diversification into non-MoR infrastructure financing presents a new growth avenue, though its impact on overall risk profile needs monitoring.

Current business mix

AUM Break-Up (FY 25-26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Lease Receivables R/S Asset (Incl. NTPC BOBR Rakes)27.5%
Lease Receivables Project Assets51.7%
Advance against Railway Infrastructure Assets to be leased13.4%
Loan to companies7.4%
Growth engines

Diversified Infrastructure Financing

Executed agreements worth ₹72,949 crore and disbursed ₹35,067 crore in non-MoR business in FY25-26, significantly scaling up diversified financing.

Strategic Diversification

Targeting critical Railway ecosystem infrastructure such as PPP projects, metros, station development, first-last mile connectivity, and ports.

Non-conventional Energy Funding

Funding renewable energy for the Railway Network is identified as an opportunity.

Capacity and execution

Non-MoR Agreements Executed

Executed agreements worth ₹72,949 crore in FY25-26 for diversified infrastructure financing.

Non-MoR Disbursements

Disbursed ₹35,067 crore in FY25-26 for non-MoR business, creating a diversified infrastructure lending portfolio pipeline.

Tailwinds

Strategic Role

IRFC is the dedicated market borrowing arm for the Indian Railways.

Government Support

MoR is required to provide for any shortfall in funding under the Standard Lease Agreement.

Regulatory Exemptions

Exempted from RBI's asset classification, provisioning, and exposure norms for direct MoR exposure, and not required to pay MAT.

Highest Credit Rating

Enjoys highest credit rating (AAA) for an Indian issuer from ICRA, CRISIL & CARE.

Risk radar

Credit Risk Concentration

92.56% of AUM is exposure to MoR, though management states it has minimal credit risk due to MoR backing.

Increased Impairment on Financial Instruments

Impairment on Financial Instruments rose significantly to INR 124.03 Cr in FY25-26 from INR 0.68 Cr in FY24-25.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The document provides annual financial statements and performance highlights for the year ended March 31, 2026, with comparisons to the previous fiscal year (FY24-25), indicating a focus on annual performance trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM Growth

AUM grew to INR 4,84,616.77 Cr in FY25-26 from INR 4,60,047.84 Cr in FY24-25, a 5.34% YoY increase.

Disbursements

Total disbursements for FY25-26 were INR 35,067 Cr, significantly up from INR 732 Cr in FY24-25.

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

Annualized NIM for FY25-26 was 1.50%.

Borrowing Cost

Company claims competitive cost of borrowing due to strong credit ratings and diversified funding sources.

Management forward view

Transformation to Diversified Financier

Management states IRFC is transforming to a diversified financier supporting broader infrastructure within the Railway ecosystem.

Strategic Collaborations

IRFC has entered into MoUs with various entities like VOCPA, SFCL, RITES, DMRC, IIFCL, REMCL, MMRDA & JNPT for strategic collaboration.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Non-MoR Disbursements₹35,067 Cr (FY25-26)Continued growth and diversification of disbursements beyond MoR.
Impairment on Financial InstrumentsINR 124.03 Cr (FY25-26)Trend in impairment charges, especially with increasing non-MoR exposure.
Net Interest Margin (NIM)1.50% (FY25-26)Stability or improvement in NIM amidst diversified funding and lending.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

41Neutral

SMA20 -11.6% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS:

Technical chart

IRFCdaily · 5Y-21.1%
Latest close ₹96.01 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+0.8%
RSI
41
MACD hist
-0.25
52W pos
18%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹84₹98₹112₹126₹14052H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 41.

  • SMA20 falling (~6.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 30% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

25U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation12/30
Growth7/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet2/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
25

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

25/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 54.8%.
  • Valuation contributes 12/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 7/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.3, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
18.0
PB
2.2
EV/EBITDA
93757.2
ROE
12.8%
ROCE
5.6%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
7.7
MoS
+54.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
25
Previous: 28 (-3)
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+54.8%
Previous: +55.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +3 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
28

Factor attribution

Valuation
12-3
was 15
Trust Score
51Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 8th percentile of the scored universe and 16th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 84.7%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-27026 Cr.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
67 docs indexed · 37 concall links
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
8th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 16th pctile, median 62 · Large: 5th pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Financial-only

67 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
22
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
48
watch · capital discipline
Results
75
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 84.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • Latest 3 quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-27026 Cr.
  • Debt/equity is 7.69.
  • Altman Z is 0.32.
  • Promoter holding fell 1.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹72.35
-32.7% MoS
DCF Fair PE
39.6
DCF Fair Value
₹212.26
+54.8% MoS
PEG
2.50

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
18.00
P/B
2.22
EV/EBITDA
93757.17
Market Cap
126072.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
12.80%
ROCE
5.64%
ROA
1.36%
Dividend Y
2.18%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
12.00%
EPS 5Y
10.00%
Revenue 3Y
5.00%
EPS 3Y
3.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
7.69
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
0.32
Book Value
43.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
-27026.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.36

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
84.65%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
15%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.