IP
IndiaPulse

JAIBALAJI

Micro Cap

Jai Balaji Industries Limited

Metals

Jai Balaji Industries is a leading Eastern India manufacturer of value-added products like DI Pipes and Specialized Ferro Alloys. It operates 4 integrated manufacturing units across West Bengal & Chhattisgarh, with 1.1 MT steel manufacturing capacity and 101.1 MW power plants. A 3 Star Export House, it exports to over 40 countries.

₹67.24
+0.42 · +0.63%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
61

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
65

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
54

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
27

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -72% YoY · margin compression · Rev +10% YoY · +31% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,745 Cr+9.8%+31.3%
EBITDA₹92 Cr-30.8%+70.4%
Operating margin5.0%-300 bps+100 bps
PAT₹21 Cr-72.0%+75.0%
PAT margin1.2%-352 bps+30 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-04T06:58:10.898Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY25 revenue and PAT declined YoY due to market sluggishness, but Q4FY25 saw sequential revenue growth. Value-added product volumes (DI Pipes, Ferro Alloys) increased YoY. Net term debt reduced significantly, exceeding management's target.

Despite management's focus on value-added products and significant debt reduction, FY25 financial performance (revenue, EBITDA, PAT) deteriorated YoY. While operational volumes for key products increased, realizations per ton declined across most segments. The FY26 targets are ambitious given the recent performance and market challenges.

Growth engines

DI Pipes Segment Growth

POSITIVE

DI Pipes industry is expected to grow at 13%-15% CAGR. Company aims to increase market share to 15%-20% post capacity expansion.

Specialized Ferro Alloys

POSITIVE

Revenues from Specialized Ferro Alloys expected to grow from 17-20% to 25-30% by FY26, sold at significant premium.

Capacity Enhancement

POSITIVE

DI Pipes capacity expected to grow to 6L TPA, Ferro Alloys to 1.9L TPA. This will drive higher volumes and market share.

Net Term Debt Reduction

POSITIVE

Sustained focus on net term debt reduction for a stronger financial position, enhancing balance sheet strength and flexibility.

Capacity and execution

DI Pipes Capacity Expansion

POSITIVE

Existing capacity 504,000 TPA, adding 96,000 TPA to reach 600,000 TPA. 204,000 T commissioned in Q4FY25; balance 100,000 T by FY26.

Ferro Alloys Capacity Expansion

POSITIVE

Existing capacity 166,000 TPA, adding 24,000 TPA to reach 190,000 TPA. Balance capacity of 24,000 T will be commissioned by Q1FY27.

Blast Furnaces Revamping

POSITIVE

Existing capacity 630,000 TPA, adding 120,000 TPA to reach 750,000 TPA. One furnace commissioned; 2nd furnace by Q4FY26.

Sinter Capacity Expansion

POSITIVE

Existing capacity 908,000 TPA, adding 300,000 TPA to reach 1,208,000 TPA. 2nd phase of 300,000 T shall be commissioned in Q4FY26.

Tailwinds

Government Infrastructure Programs

POSITIVE

JAL JEEVAN MISSION and MISSION AMRUT SAROVAR drive increased requirement for DI Pipes. Government investing heavily in infrastructure.

Special Grade Ferro Alloys Market

POSITIVE

Strengthening of Special Grade Ferro Alloys market provides opportunities for premium products.

Cost Effective Logistics

POSITIVE

Company has 3 railway sidings, saving significant costs by using rail transport over road for raw materials.

Headwinds

Industry-wide Challenges

NEGATIVE

Company faced industry-wide challenges in FY25, including a temporary slowdown in government orders and market sluggishness.

Commodity Price Impacts

NEGATIVE

Commodity price impacts are identified as a weakness and a risk in the SWOT analysis and disclaimer.

Risk radar

Fiscal Policy & Economic Conditions

NEGATIVE

Risks and uncertainties include fiscal policy and general economic conditions affecting demand/supply and price conditions.

Competition

NEGATIVE

Competition is identified as a risk factor that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

Inflationary Pressures

NEGATIVE

Inflationary pressures are cited as a risk, alongside general economic conditions, affecting market dynamics.

Geopolitical Instability

NEGATIVE

Geopolitical instability is listed as a threat in the SWOT analysis.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The document provides both YoY and QoQ comparisons for financial results, and YoY for full-year operational performance. For the metals sector, both annual trends and sequential momentum in volumes, realizations, and utilization are crucial for assessing performance and market conditions.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

DI Pipes Production Volume

POSITIVE

FY25 production was 281,913 tons, up from 242,121 tons in FY24. Q4FY25 production was 72,000 tons, up from 66,000 tons in Q4FY24.

Ferro Alloys Production Volume

MIXED

FY25 production was 124,362 tons, up from 115,384 tons in FY24. Q4FY25 production was 30,000 tons, down from 33,000 tons in Q4FY24.

DI Pipes Realization

NEGATIVE

FY25 realization was Rs. 74,169 per ton, down from Rs. 77,106 per ton in FY24. Q4FY25 realization was Rs. 68,314 per ton, down from Rs. 83,554 per ton in Q4FY24.

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

NEGATIVE

FY25 Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 14%, down from 15% in FY24. Q4FY25 Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 9%, down from 14% in Q4FY24.

Management forward view

FY26 Revenue Growth Target

POSITIVE

Management is optimistic about a revival in government ordering activity and targets 25–30% revenue growth for FY26.

FY26 EBITDA Margin Target

POSITIVE

Management aims to achieve 16–17% EBITDA margins in FY26, driven by focus on value-added segments.

FY26 DI Pipe Production Target

POSITIVE

Management targets DI Pipe production exceeding 400,000 tons in FY26, leveraging increased capacities.

Sustained Debt Reduction

POSITIVE

Management expects to continue its sustained focus on net term debt reduction for a stronger financial position.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
DI Pipes ProductionFY25: 281,913 tonsAchievement of FY26 target exceeding 400,000 tons.
Adjusted EBITDA MarginFY25: 14%Progress towards the FY26 target of 16%-17%.
Net Term DebtRs. 2,214 Mn (as of Mar'25)Continued reduction and maintenance of a strong financial position.
Revenue GrowthFY25: -1% YoYAchievement of FY26 target of 25%-30% growth.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

54Neutral

SMA20 +10.8% / mo

Stock trend: 57
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.8% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

JAIBALAJIweekly · 3Y-93.6%
Latest close ₹67.24 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-0.5%
RSI
40
MACD hist
0.52
52W pos
16%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹2₹287₹572₹858₹1.1k52H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 40.

  • SMA20 rising (~9.7% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 40 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 52% off 52W high · 25% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

61U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth23/25
Quality19/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
61

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

61/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Quality contributes 19/20 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 23/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 31.1%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
20.8
PB
2.7
EV/EBITDA
10.4
ROE
30.7%
ROCE
36.1%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.3
MoS
+0.2%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
61
Previous: 61
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+0.2%
Previous: +0.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +29 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
57
58
58
58
58
58
59
58
59
59
32
61

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
65Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 46th percentile of the scored universe and 39th percentile within Metals. Main check: results consistency is weak at 27/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 64.8%. Key concern: Promoter pledge is elevated at 31.1%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
46th percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 39th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 30th pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
54
watch · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
80
strong · capital discipline
Results
27
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 64.8%.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.
  • ROCE is 36.1%.

Trust risks

  • Promoter pledge is elevated at 31.1%.
  • 4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE trend is -2.6%.
  • 2/7 recent quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹41.98
-60.2% MoS
DCF Fair PE
21.0
DCF Fair Value
₹67.41
+0.2% MoS
PEG
0.27

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
20.80
P/B
2.74
EV/EBITDA
10.36
Market Cap
6096.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
30.70%
ROCE
36.10%
ROA
7.43%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
17.00%
EPS 5Y
48.00%
Revenue 3Y
11.00%
EPS 3Y
120.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.30
Interest Coverage
8.16×
Altman Z
4.03
Book Value
24.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
311.00 Cr
EPS TTM
3.21

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
64.84%
Promoter Pledge
31.10%
Momentum 52W
16%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.