JITFINFRA
Small CapJITF Infralogistics Limited
Infra
JITF Infralogistics Limited operates in Logistics, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 15/100PAT -296% YoY · Rev +14% YoY · margin expansion · +9% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹898.3 Cr | +14.1% | +9.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹159.3 Cr | +23.7% | +3.8% |
| Operating margin | 17.7% | +138 bps | -94 bps |
| PAT | ₹-7.8 Cr | -296.5% | -142.2% |
| PAT margin | -0.9% | -138 bps | -313 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
JITF Infralogistics Limited operates in Logistics, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
52Neutrallabel neutral
Technical chart
JITFINFRAdaily · 3Y-3.8%Technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 47.
- SMA20 falling (~4.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 47 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 31% off 52W high · 34% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
- Growth contributes 14/25 to the score.
- Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 0.9, in distress territory.
- Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 57th percentile of the scored universe and 63rd percentile within Infra. Main check: results consistency is weak at 27/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 63%. Key concern: 5 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Infra: 63rd pctile, median 65 · Small: 62nd pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 63%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 0%.
- ▸8 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸5 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸ROCE is low at 0.1%.
- ▸ROE is low at 0.1%.
- ▸2/7 recent quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- —
- P/B
- —
- EV/EBITDA
- 7.13
- Market Cap
- 767.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- —
- ROCE
- 15.40%
- ROA
- -0.20%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 25.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 10.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 21.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 16.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.00
- Interest Coverage
- 1.39×
- Altman Z
- 0.86
- Book Value
- -200.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 1/5
- OCF
- 199.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- -18.72
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 63.03%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 29%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.