IP
IndiaPulse

JKLAKSHMI

Micro Cap

JK Lakshmi Cement Limited

Industrials

JK Lakshmi Cement Limited is an Indian cement manufacturer with operations primarily in North, West, and a small part of East India. The company focuses on grey cement and is undertaking significant capacity expansion projects while also diversifying into adjacent building materials.

₹593
+1.70 · +0.29%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
38

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
62

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
27

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -29% YoY · margin compression · Rev +0% YoY · +20% QoQ

Filed 20 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,902 Cr+0.2%+19.8%
EBITDA₹275 Cr-21.7%+34.1%
Operating margin14.0%-500 bps+100 bps
PAT₹125 Cr-28.6%+119.3%
PAT margin6.6%-265 bps+298 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T09:38:52.740Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 cement demand grew 7% pan-India, Q4 volumes up 17% QoQ, but capacity utilization declined to 69%. Surging fuel costs and intense competition restricted price hikes, impacting margins.

The company is pursuing aggressive capacity expansion and efficiency improvements, targeting 30 MTPA by 2030. However, immediate challenges include surging fuel costs, industry overcapacity leading to weak pricing power, and potential delays in project execution. Profitability is under pressure, with Q4 FY26 EBITDA/ton at INR730, below the management's INR1000 ambition.

Growth engines

Capacity Expansion

Ongoing projects in East (Durg, Northeast), and planned projects in Kutch and Nagaur to achieve 30 MTPA by 2030.

Utilization Ramp-up

Leveraging headroom in Surat (60%+ utilization), Udaipur, and Cuttack to grow higher than industry in FY27.

Premium Product Focus

Rejuvenated legacy brand Green+ and launched Lime Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) to improve market positioning and pricing.

Efficiency Improvements

Relentlessly working on renewable energy scale-up, thermal substitution, emission reduction, and digital/AI/ML deployment in manufacturing units.

Capacity and execution

Surat Grinding Unit

Commissioned around end of September 2025 (1.35 MTPA added).

Durg Expansion (East)

Expected to come by end of FY28, including clinker and grinding units. INR500 crores spent by FY26 end.

Northeast Project

Clinker and grinding units expected one year after Durg (FY29), with a size slightly higher than 1.5 MTPA.

Kutch Project

Expected by FY30, prioritized ahead of Nagaur.

Tailwinds

Pan-India Cement Demand Growth

Grew by about 7% in FY26 to 480 million tons, estimated 6% growth for FY27, driven by housing and infrastructure.

Improving Demand Sentiment

April demand was better, and green shoots in demand observed from May 15th onwards after initial sluggishness due to elections.

Headwinds

Industry Overcapacity

Highest ever annual capacity addition of 64 million tons in FY26, leading to pan-India utilization of 69% and intense competition.

Surging Fuel Costs

Pet coke prices up by about 40% QoQ to $160/ton, global coal prices up by about 30% QoQ due to geopolitical situation.

Restricted Price Hikes

Substantial capacity addition and intense competition restricted meaningful price hikes, especially in geographies where the company operates.

Expected Cost Increases

Energy costs expected to rise by at least INR300/ton and packaging cost by INR80-100/ton in coming quarters, with INR100-130/ton impact in Q1.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Volatility

Middle East conflict causing weak sentiment, surging fuel costs, and potential for higher operational expenditure if sustained.

Pricing Power Weakness

Despite sector consolidation, cement demand outlook suggests slowdown with pricing power staying weak due to overcapacity and competition.

Project Execution Delays

Nagaur project delayed due to land acquisition and Aravalli issues; Durg railway siding dependent on external agencies.

AMDCL Contract Recovery

INR130 crores in other non-current assets from cancelled AMDCL contract; next High Court hearing in July, but recovery timeline uncertain.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Industry demand growth is primarily discussed YoY (7% for FY26), while Q4 volume growth is highlighted QoQ (17%). Sequential cost increases and demand fluctuations within Q4 and into Q1 make QoQ relevant for momentum, alongside YoY for overall trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Pan-India Capacity Utilization

Estimated at around 69% at the end of March 2026, marginally lower than previous year.

Surat Plant Utilization

Utilizing capacity more than 60% already, ahead of 18-24 month ramp-up plan, targeting 70%+ this year.

FY26 Clinker Production

92.26 lakh tons.

Q4 FY26 Clinker Production

24.72 lakh tons.

Management forward view

30 MTPA Target by 2030

Reasonably confident of achieving 30 million tons capacity by 2030, with ongoing East projects well on track.

FY27 Growth Outlook

Expects to grow higher than the industry in FY27 by ramping up Surat, Udaipur, and Cuttack capacities and improving blended cement ratio.

EBITDA Gap Reduction

Aims to reduce the EBITDA gap with industry leaders by another INR50-75 in FY27 through internal actions and efficiency levers.

Adjacent Building Materials

Strategy is to expand into adjacent building materials like tile adhesives, plastering solutions, AAC blocks, and RMC to offer a portfolio of products.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
EBITDA per tonQ4 FY26: INR730Improvement towards INR1000 target and reduction of gap with industry leaders (target INR50-75 reduction in FY27).
Surat Plant UtilizationCurrently >60%Ramp-up to 70%+ utilization this year, as per management's target.
Cost Inflation vs. Price HikesQ1 expected INR100-130/ton cost inflationAbility to effectively pass on cost increases through price hikes, especially in the trade segment, given volatile external factors.
Durg & Northeast Project TimelinesDurg by FY28 end, Northeast by FY29Adherence to commissioning schedules and capital expenditure phasing (FY27: INR1500-1700cr, FY28: ~INR2000cr).

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -13.7% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

JKLAKSHMIweekly · 6M-24.3%
Latest close ₹590.15 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
35
MACD hist
3.35
52W pos
15%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹537₹609₹680₹752₹82452H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-122026-022026-042026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 35.

  • RSI(14) at 35 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 27% off 52W high · 7% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

38U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation8/30
Growth6/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
38

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

38/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.7%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -105.2%.
  • Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 6/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
17.2
PB
1.9
EV/EBITDA
7.5
ROE
11.5%
ROCE
12.5%
FCF Yield
4.7%
Debt/Equity
0.7
MoS
-105.2%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
38
Previous: 38
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-105.2%
Previous: -104.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
38
38
41
41
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
62Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 34th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Industrials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 27/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
34th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 30th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 19th pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
70
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
27
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4.5%.
  • 8 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Promoter holding fell 1.2%.
  • 2/7 recent quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹483.47
-22.7% MoS
DCF Fair PE
8.7
DCF Fair Value
₹289.08
-105.2% MoS
PEG
10.75

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.20
P/B
1.89
EV/EBITDA
7.49
Market Cap
7331.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
11.50%
ROCE
12.50%
ROA
4.83%
Dividend Y
1.10%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
1.00%
Revenue 3Y
2.00%
EPS 3Y
7.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.67
Interest Coverage
4.74×
Altman Z
2.91
Book Value
313.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
4.69%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
1082.00 Cr
EPS TTM
33.19

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
45.12%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
9%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.