IP
IndiaPulse

KAKATCEM

Small Cap

Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Limited

Consumer

Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Limited operates in Sugar, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹123.4
+4.99 · +4.21%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
11

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
61

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
5

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 5/100

Rev -25% YoY · margin expansion · +13% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹14.8 Cr-25.3%+13.5%
EBITDA₹-5.8 Cr+45.2%+1.5%
Operating margin-39.4%+1427 bps+599 bps
PAT₹-4.4 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-29.9%+971 bps+763 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Limited operates in Sugar, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 +5.2% / mo

Stock trend: 58
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -0.7% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

KAKATCEMdaily · 5Y-11.9%
Latest close ₹123.40 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+2.8%
RSI
49
MACD hist
-0.50
52W pos
53%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹81₹101₹121₹141₹16252H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 49.

  • SMA20 falling (~6.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 49 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 22% off 52W high · 45% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

11U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth2/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
2/9 (+0)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
11

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

11/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 9/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 5/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 2/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
PB
0.5
EV/EBITDA
ROE
-8.5%
ROCE
-7.5%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
11
Previous: 11
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
18
18
18
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
61Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 30th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
30th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 30th pctile, median 67 · Small: 35th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
80
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 125.5%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.05.

Trust risks

  • 3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE is low at -3.1%.
  • ROE is low at -6.1%.
  • ROCE trend is -9.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
DCF Fair PE
2.9
DCF Fair Value
— MoS
PEG

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
P/B
0.50
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
92.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-8.53%
ROCE
-7.54%
ROA
-10.43%
Dividend Y
2.53%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-8.00%
EPS 5Y
-16.00%
Revenue 3Y
-20.00%
EPS 3Y
-17.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.11
Interest Coverage
-21.00×
Altman Z
2.57
Book Value
235.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
-21.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-30.95

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
54.25%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
35%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.