LPDC
Small CapLandmark Property Development Company Limited
Real Estate
Landmark Property Development Company Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Average · 30/100YoY data unavailable — classification deferred
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹5.8 Cr | NDF | +262.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹1.5 Cr | +1066.7% | +1712.5% |
| Operating margin | 25.2% | NDF | +2014 bps |
| PAT | ₹1.3 Cr | NDF | +412.0% |
| PAT margin | 22.2% | NDF | +650 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
Landmark Property Development Company Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
57NeutralSMA20 +6.3% / mo
Technical chart
LPDCdaily · 3Y-11.7%Technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 42.
- SMA20 falling (~9.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 42 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 30% off 52W high · 27% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.
- Growth contributes 15/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
- Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -82.9%.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality
Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 21st percentile of the scored universe and 38th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.
Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 64.9%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹0 Cr.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Real Estate: 38th pctile, median 61 · Small: 25th pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 64.9%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸6 years of positive FCF.
- ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.
Trust risks
- ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹0 Cr.
- ▸3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸ROCE is low at -8.5%.
- ▸ROE is low at -8.9%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 61.50
- P/B
- 2.21
- EV/EBITDA
- 78.97
- Market Cap
- 91.60Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 3.66%
- ROCE
- 4.86%
- ROA
- 3.45%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 49.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 30.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 98.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 31.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.00
- Interest Coverage
- —
- Altman Z
- 7.52
- Book Value
- 3.09
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 1.06%
- FCF Positive Y
- 6/5
- OCF
- 6.73 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 0.11
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 64.87%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 35%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.