IP
IndiaPulse

MAL

SME Cap

Mangalam Alloys Ltd.

Metals

Mangalam Alloys Ltd. operates in Stainless Steel, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹30.4
-1.60 · -5.00%
Quote09 Jun, 12:00 am
Fundamentals09 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags24 Apr 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is a red flag, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
0

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
40

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -40% YoY · margin compression · Rev +34% YoY

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹219 Cr+33.5%+0.0%
EBITDA₹27 Cr-30.8%-3.6%
Operating margin12.0%-500 bps-100 bps
PAT₹3 Cr-40.0%-75.0%
PAT margin1.4%-376 bps-411 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Mangalam Alloys Ltd. operates in Stainless Steel, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -2.6% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.8% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

MALweekly · 5Y-47.0%
Latest close ₹30.40 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-0.3%
RSI
29
MACD hist
-0.63
52W pos
38%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹-4₹18₹40₹62₹8452H52L2024-032024-092025-032025-092026-03Vol2023-102024-082025-062026-012026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 29. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~2.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 29 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 62% off 52W high · Infinity% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

0U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth1/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
0

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

0/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 5.3%.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 1/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
  • Promoter pledge is 54.2%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
48.7
PB
EV/EBITDA
6.8
ROE
2.4%
ROCE
7.4%
FCF Yield
5.3%
Debt/Equity
2.5
MoS
-10544.1%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Debt/equity is 2.5, so downturn resilience matters.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
0
Previous: 0
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-10544.1%
Previous: -11105.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
40Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 2nd percentile within Metals. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 8/100.

Low Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 59.7%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 54.2% of holding.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
1st percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 2nd pctile, median 68 · SME: 1st pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Do not rely on management narrative unless hard turnaround evidence is visible.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
43
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
53
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
8
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 59.7%.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4.2%.

Trust risks

  • Promoters have pledged 54.2% of holding.
  • Debt/equity is 2.52.
  • Altman Z is 1.73.
  • Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
DCF Fair PE
0.3
DCF Fair Value
₹0.29
-10544.1% MoS
PEG

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
48.70
P/B
EV/EBITDA
6.83
Market Cap
75.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
2.41%
ROCE
7.43%
ROA
0.62%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-10.38%
EPS 5Y
-71.43%
Revenue 3Y
-10.38%
EPS 3Y
-71.43%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
2.52
Interest Coverage
1.63×
Altman Z
1.68
Book Value

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
5.33%
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
6.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.84

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
59.74%
Promoter Pledge
54.20%
Momentum 52W
2%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.