MASTERTR
Small CapMaster Trust Limited
Financial Services
Master Trust Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Strong fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, but price trend argues for patience. Suitable for staggered entry or watchlist confirmation rather than aggressive buying.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 72/100Rev +48% YoY · PAT +44% YoY · +32% QoQ · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹181 Cr | +48.4% | +32.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹64 Cr | +20.8% | +4.9% |
| Operating margin | 35.0% | -800 bps | -1000 bps |
| PAT | ₹36 Cr | +44.0% | +12.5% |
| PAT margin | 19.9% | -60 bps | -347 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
Master Trust Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
42NeutralSMA20 -13.8% / mo
Technical chart
MASTERTRdaily · 5Y-38.4%Technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 40. Wait for confirmation.
- SMA20 rising (~7.3% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
- RSI(14) at 40 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 42% off 52W high · 35% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
DEEP VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 77.8%.
- Valuation contributes 29/30 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 1.6, in distress territory.
- Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Quality is weaker at 9/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 57th percentile of the scored universe and 75th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 55/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 71.9%. Key concern: Altman Z is 1.72.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 75th pctile, median 62 · Small: 62nd pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 71.9%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸Promoter holding increased 2.7%.
- ▸8 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸Altman Z is 1.72.
- ▸ROCE trend is -5.2%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 7.31
- P/B
- 1.13
- EV/EBITDA
- 4.79
- Market Cap
- 921.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 17.30%
- ROCE
- 23.80%
- ROA
- 5.61%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 21.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 30.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 19.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 24.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.28
- Interest Coverage
- 4.00×
- Altman Z
- 1.62
- Book Value
- 66.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 8/5
- OCF
- 311.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 10.25
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 71.93%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 17%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.