IP
IndiaPulse

MENNPIS

Small Cap

Menon Pistons Limited

Auto

Menon Pistons Limited operates in Auto Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹54.25
+0.86 · +1.61%
Quote09 Jun, 12:00 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, timing is unclear, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
74

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
75

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
pending

Technical trend unavailable.

Result consistency
mixed
63

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 32/100

margin compression · Rev +31% YoY · PAT +4% YoY

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹73.2 Cr+31.3%-3.8%
EBITDA₹8.3 Cr-10.4%-33.7%
Operating margin11.3%-527 bps-513 bps
PAT₹4.4 Cr+4.5%-30.9%
PAT margin6.1%-156 bps-239 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Menon Pistons Limited operates in Auto Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

Trend score is pending. The candlestick chart remains available for manual review.

Technical chart

MENNPISdaily · 6M-4.8%
Latest close ₹54.25 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+2.0%
RSI
39
MACD hist
-0.72
52W pos
18%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹52₹55₹58₹61₹6352H52LVol2026-042026-052026-052026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 39.

  • RSI(14) at 39 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

74U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation26/30
Growth13/25
Quality10/20
Balance Sheet14/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
74

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

74/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 7.7%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 72.7%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 10/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 13/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
10.6
PB
1.5
EV/EBITDA
4.7
ROE
15.4%
ROCE
21.5%
FCF Yield
7.7%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+72.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
74
Previous: 74
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+72.7%
Previous: +73.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
70
70
73
71
71
71
75
75
75
75
75
74

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
75Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 79th percentile of the scored universe and 63rd percentile within Auto. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 74.4%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -3.1%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
79th percentile

overall median 67 · Auto: 63rd pctile, median 71 · Small: 83rd pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
64
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
63
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 74.4%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4.6%.
  • Debt/equity is 0.09.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -3.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹62.69
+13.5% MoS
DCF Fair PE
39.6
DCF Fair Value
₹198.79
+72.7% MoS
PEG
1.06

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
10.60
P/B
1.53
EV/EBITDA
4.69
Market Cap
272.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
15.40%
ROCE
21.50%
ROA
11.26%
Dividend Y
1.87%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
12.00%
EPS 5Y
12.00%
Revenue 3Y
7.00%
EPS 3Y
7.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.03
Interest Coverage
11.75×
Altman Z
6.39
Book Value
34.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
7.72%
FCF Positive Y
3/5
OCF
51.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.02

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.37%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
28%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.