IP
IndiaPulse

MRPL

Small Cap

Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited

Power

Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) is a Schedule 'A' Govt. of India Enterprise and a subsidiary of ONGC. It operates a complex refinery with 3 crude trains, focusing on refining and expanding into fuel marketing. It is ISO 9001, 14001, and 50001 certified.

₹160.34
+8.79 · +5.80%
Quote09 Jun, 12:00 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
Good U-Score but weak results consistency: verify latest quarters.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
72

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
65

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
43

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
15

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -3% YoY · PAT -68% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 24 Apr 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹23,950 Cr-2.6%-3.1%
EBITDA₹1,781 Cr+57.6%-36.1%
Operating margin7.0%+200 bps-400 bps
PAT₹117 Cr-68.5%-91.9%
PAT margin0.5%-102 bps-538 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-06T09:08:32.171Z
Management commentary snapshot

MRPL posted a significant jump in Q3 FY26 performance with EBITDA of Rs. 2,824 crores, up from Rs. 1,064 crore YoY. Healthy market prices, optimum energy consumption, and high throughput drove strong bottom-line numbers.

MRPL delivered strong Q3 FY26 results driven by favorable market conditions and operational efficiency. Management's strategic focus on retail expansion and diversification into Bio-ATF and specialty chemicals like IBB could provide future stability and growth, despite ongoing geopolitical and freight rate volatility.

Current business mix

Product Slate by Volume (Q3 FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
HSD + ATF50.0%
MS15.0%
Other Products (including 10% F&L)35.0%
Growth engines

Retail Outlet Expansion

Targeting 500 outlets in 3 years and 1,000 in 5 years, as retail margins are superior and provide stability.

Bio-ATF Plant

Establishing a Bio-ATF plant to comply with CORSIA Norms, enabling supply of blended ATF globally starting 2027.

Isobutyl Benzene (IBB) Pilot Plant

Efforts of the innovation team will start to show from next year when the IBB pilot plant (base for pharmaceutical) gets running.

Complex Refinery Advantage

The refinery is biased towards heavier crude processing due to its complex nature, which is economically more suiting.

Capacity and execution

Retail Outlets

Achieved 200 outlets, targeting around 250 outlets within this fiscal year itself.

Bio-ATF Plant

Establishing a Bio-ATF plant at a cost of Rs. 364 crores, to supply blended ATF from 2027.

Grid Power Project

Will be completed within the next fiscal year, bringing fuel and loss closer to 9.5-10%.

Depots and Pipelines

Targeting establishment of depots in adjoining states like Mumbai, Vizag, Kerala, and the Bangalore airport pipeline (Devangonti-Devanhalli).

Tailwinds

Healthy Market Prices

Healthy market prices, optimum energy consumption, and throughput led to published bottom-line numbers.

Finished Product Cracks

Finished product cracks went significantly up, more than offsetting the loss on account of Russian barrels.

Desalination Plant

MRPL is now well past its summer water blues due to the desalination plant.

Headwinds

Freight Rates

Did see a spike in freight rates earlier in Q3, though they have gradually come down from peak levels, still higher than Q1.

Russian Crude Sourcing

No Russian crude is being imported due to sanctions, though management states it played a marginal role and its loss is not a significant impact.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Conditions and Sanctions

Uncertainties prevailing in market sourcing under sanctions, with implications of new sanctions packages being monitored.

Freight Rate Volatility

Freight rates, while moderated, remain higher than Q1 levels, impacting import costs.

Government Control and Taxation

Market perception that pricing and taxation are still controlled by the government, impacting valuations.

Forex Volatility

Volatility in the Forex market could impact ECB debt repayment due to potential foreign exchange loss.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Management explicitly highlighted a significant jump in performance both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter, indicating strong current momentum against prior periods.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

EBITDA

Rs. 2,824 crores for Q3 FY26 versus Rs. 1,064 crore for Q3 FY25.

MBN (Energy Efficiency)

Posted MBN of 67, which was the best number posted in any quarter.

Fuel and Loss (F&L)

Stood at 10.06% for the quarter, one of the best in any of the quarters.

Current Debt

Stands at Rs. 9,290 crores.

Management forward view

Retail as a Game Changer

Retail is going to be a big game changer for the refinery, offering superior margins and stability compared to export sales.

Full-fledged Refinery and Marketing Business

In the future, the company aims to be a full-fledged refinery and marketing business, not just limited to refining.

Dividend Possibility

If Q4 remains profitable, the board might actually look at a dividend, considering the good performance in the first three quarters.

Addressing Low Public Float

The company's low public float (approx. 12%) is an issue being examined with parent companies to address.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Retail Outlet Count200 outletsAchievement of 250 outlets by fiscal year-end and progress towards 500 in 3 years.
Fuel and Loss (F&L)10.06%Reduction to 9.5-10% with the completion of the grid power project in the next fiscal year.
Capex IncurredRs. 887 crores (9M FY26)Total Capex for FY26 reaching ~Rs. 1,500 crores and similar levels for FY27, with breakdown between growth and maintenance.
Debt ReductionRs. 9,290 croresFurther reduction in debt during the next quarter if the market remains good, and management's call on ECB repayment.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

43Neutral

SMA20 -7.4% / mo

Stock trend: 43
Sector RS:

Technical chart

MRPLweekly · 5Y-0.3%
Latest close ₹160.34 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+4.6%
RSI
52
MACD hist
0.33
52W pos
43%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹100₹129₹159₹188₹21852H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 52. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~8.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 52 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 24% off 52W high · 33% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

72U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation19/30
Growth22/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
72

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

72/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.3%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 55.8%.
  • Cash flow contributes 9/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 9/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 19/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 10/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
13.8
PB
1.9
EV/EBITDA
5.4
ROE
14.2%
ROCE
17.7%
FCF Yield
4.3%
Debt/Equity
1.1
MoS
+55.8%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Debt/equity is 1.1, so downturn resilience matters.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
72
Previous: 72
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+55.8%
Previous: +58.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
65Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 46th percentile of the scored universe and 41st percentile within Power. Main check: results consistency is weak at 15/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 88.6%. Key concern: 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
19 docs indexed · 11 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
46th percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 41st pctile, median 67 · Small: 51st pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

19 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
69
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
15
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 88.6%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4.3%.
  • 8 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Debt/equity is 1.08.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹141.46
-13.3% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹362.34
+55.8% MoS
PEG
0.39

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
13.80
P/B
1.88
EV/EBITDA
5.41
Market Cap
26578.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.20%
ROCE
17.70%
ROA
0.13%
Dividend Y
2.64%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
23.00%
EPS 5Y
35.00%
Revenue 3Y
-7.00%
EPS 3Y
-10.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.08
Interest Coverage
6.87×
Altman Z
3.49
Book Value
81.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
4.34%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
2531.00 Cr
EPS TTM
10.98

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
88.58%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
34%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 94.7k+4.7% vs prev
0109kMar 2016: 39.7kMar 2017: 43.8kMar 2018: 49.1kMar 2019: 63.4kMar 2020: 50.2kMar 2021: 32.0kMar 2022: 69.8kMar 2023: 109.0kMar 2024: 90.4kMar 2025: 94.7kFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 56.0-98.4% vs prev
-404303597Mar 2016: 506Mar 2017: 3,293Mar 2018: 1,774Mar 2019: 351Mar 2020: -4,043Mar 2021: -765Mar 2022: 2,958Mar 2023: 2,655Mar 2024: 3,597Mar 2025: 56.0FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 0.4-98.4% vs prev
-63.6041.0Mar 2016: 8.4%Mar 2017: 34.6%Mar 2018: 17.3%Mar 2019: 3.5%Mar 2020: -63.6%Mar 2021: -18.0%Mar 2022: 41.0%Mar 2023: 26.9%Mar 2024: 27.1%Mar 2025: 0.4%FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.