MYMUDRA
SME CapMy Mudra Fincorp Ltd.
Financial Services
My Mudra Fincorp Ltd. operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 67/100Rev +51% YoY · PAT +75% YoY · operating leverage · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹59 Cr | +51.3% | +1.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹10 Cr | +11.1% | +25.0% |
| Operating margin | 17.0% | -200 bps | +300 bps |
| PAT | ₹7 Cr | +75.0% | +40.0% |
| PAT margin | 11.9% | -91 bps | +324 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
My Mudra Fincorp Ltd. operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
46NeutralSMA20 -1.3% / mo
Technical chart
MYMUDRAdaily · 3Y-9.5%Technical trend read
NeutralTrend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 52.
- SMA20 falling (~6.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 52 — sideways, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 18% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 77.8%.
- Valuation contributes 29/30 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
- Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Quality is weaker at 11/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 64th percentile of the scored universe and 81st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 57.9%. Key concern: Only 0 years of positive FCF.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 81st pctile, median 62 · SME: 78th pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 57.9%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸ROCE is 31.4%.
Trust risks
- ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
- ▸ROCE trend is -14.9%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 7.29
- P/B
- 1.34
- EV/EBITDA
- 4.69
- Market Cap
- 87.50Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 20.20%
- ROCE
- 26.20%
- ROA
- 14.29%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 27.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 27.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 30.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 51.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.17
- Interest Coverage
- 19.00×
- Altman Z
- 6.08
- Book Value
- 57.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 0/5
- OCF
- 2.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 10.53
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 57.89%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 28%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.