IP
IndiaPulse

OMFREIGHT

Small Cap

Om Freight Forwarders Limited

Services

Om Freight Forwarders Limited operates in Shipping, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹81.24
-0.24 · -0.29%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
21

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
46

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT -43% YoY · margin compression · Rev +21% YoY · +26% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹149.5 Cr+21.2%+25.6%
EBITDA₹7.1 Cr-37.6%-5.1%
Operating margin4.7%-447 bps-153 bps
PAT₹4.1 Cr-42.5%-11.4%
PAT margin2.8%-305 bps-115 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Om Freight Forwarders Limited operates in Shipping, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

46Neutral

SMA20 -2.5% / mo

Stock trend: 43
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.3% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

OMFREIGHTdaily · 5Y-9.9%
Latest close ₹81.24 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-2.0%
RSI
40
MACD hist
-0.95
52W pos
46%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹57₹70₹83₹96₹11052H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 40. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 rising (~3.8% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 40 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 24% off 52W high · 38% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

21U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation9/30
Growth2/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
21

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

21/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 12/15 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 9/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 2/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -480.6%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
17.1
PB
1.3
EV/EBITDA
8.5
ROE
8.4%
ROCE
10.4%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-480.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
21
Previous: 21
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-480.6%
Previous: -486.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
35
35
24
24
24
24
21
21
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 57th percentile of the scored universe and 64th percentile within Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 74.9%. Key concern: Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
57th percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 64th pctile, median 66 · Small: 62nd pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 74.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.

Trust risks

  • Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹81.22
-0.0% MoS
DCF Fair PE
2.9
DCF Fair Value
₹13.99
-480.6% MoS
PEG

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.10
P/B
1.32
EV/EBITDA
8.53
Market Cap
274.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
8.42%
ROCE
10.40%
ROA
4.17%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
0.42%
EPS 5Y
-16.01%
Revenue 3Y
0.42%
EPS 3Y
-17.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.24
Interest Coverage
14.00×
Altman Z
3.25
Book Value
61.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
-7.00 Cr
EPS TTM
4.76

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.85%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
47%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 76.4-29.9% vs prev
0482.5Mar 2026: 482Mar 2024: 110Mar 2023: 132Mar 2022: 109Mar 2021: 76.4FY26FY24FY23FY22FY21

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.