IP
IndiaPulse

PROPEQUITY

SME Cap

P. E. Analytics Ltd.

Real Estate

P. E. Analytics Ltd. operates in Real Estate Analytics, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹215
+0.00 · +0.00%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags24 Apr 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
64

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
High Trust
85

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
50

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
69

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Good · 65/100

Rev +14% YoY · PAT +14% YoY · margin expansion · +14% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹25 Cr+13.6%+13.6%
EBITDA₹8 Cr+33.3%+33.3%
Operating margin33.0%+700 bps+400 bps
PAT₹8 Cr+14.3%+14.3%
PAT margin32.0%+473 bps+18 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

P. E. Analytics Ltd. operates in Real Estate Analytics, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

50Neutral

label neutral

Stock trend: 50
Sector RS:

Technical chart

PROPEQUITYweekly · 3Y+16.2%
Latest close ₹215.00 on 2026-06-08
Bar
+8.0%
RSI
51
MACD hist
-4.09
52W pos
57%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹139₹173₹207₹240₹27452H52L2026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-032026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 51.

  • RSI(14) at 51 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 20% off 52W high · 48% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

64U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation16/30
Growth16/25
Quality10/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
64

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

64/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 6.2%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 56.5%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 10/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 16/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
14.4
PB
2.1
EV/EBITDA
16.1
ROE
16.1%
ROCE
21.3%
FCF Yield
6.2%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+56.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
64
Previous: 64
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+56.5%
Previous: +56.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
60
60
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
85High Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

High Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 98th percentile of the scored universe and 99th percentile within Real Estate. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 75%. Key concern: OPM spread across recent quarters is 16%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
High Trust

Management behaviour ranks as unusually reliable. Still verify valuation and cycle risk.

Relative rank
98th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 99th pctile, median 61 · SME: 100th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

High Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
69
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 75%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • Promoter holding increased 7.9%.
  • FCF yield is 5.2%.

Trust risks

  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 16%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹183.53
-17.1% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹494.01
+56.5% MoS
PEG
0.92

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
14.40
P/B
2.15
EV/EBITDA
16.07
Market Cap
225.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.10%
ROCE
21.30%
ROA
13.11%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
17.00%
EPS 3Y
15.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
8.16
Book Value
100.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
6.22%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
11.00 Cr
EPS TTM
14.97

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
57%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.