IP
IndiaPulse

PRSMJOHNSN

Micro Cap

Prism Johnson Limited

Industrials

Prism Johnson Limited is an integrated building materials company in India, operating in Prism Cement, H&R Johnson (Tiles, Bath Fittings), and Prism RMC. The company prioritizes financial discipline, deleveraging, cost normalisation, and operational efficiencies across its businesses.

₹118.35
+0.24 · +0.20%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
25

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
66

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
27

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -113% YoY · margin compression · Rev +8% YoY · +20% QoQ

Filed 14 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,110 Cr+7.7%+20.4%
EBITDA₹175 Cr-11.2%+10.8%
Operating margin8.0%-200 bps-100 bps
PAT₹-16 Cr-113.2%-132.0%
PAT margin-0.8%-693 bps-361 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T12:40:22.305Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 consolidated revenue grew 8.4% YoY to ₹7,404 crore, with EBITDA up 52.1% YoY to ₹693 crore, driven by balance sheet strengthening. Q4 FY26 EBITDA declined 11.4% YoY due to a one-off cement maintenance shutdown.

The company delivered strong FY26 consolidated performance, significantly reducing net debt and improving operating margins. While Q4 cement EBITDA was impacted by a planned shutdown and HRJ faces short-term inventory issues, the overall financial discipline and RMC recovery are positive indicators.

Current business mix

Revenue Mix - FY26

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Prism Cement46.0%
H&R Johnson33.0%
Prism RMC21.0%
Growth engines

Premium Product Mix (Cement)

Share of premium products in total cement sales volume increased to 54% in FY26 vs 42% in FY25.

Operating Leverage (H&R Johnson)

66.2% capacity utilization in FY26 provides meaningful headroom for operating leverage as utilisation improves.

Commercial Concrete (Prism RMC)

Commercial Concrete volumes grew 11.9% YoY in Q4 FY26, driving RMC revenue growth.

Value-Added Products (Prism RMC)

Share of value-added products of total Commercial Concrete volume increased to 29% in FY26 compared to 19% in FY25.

Capacity and execution

Prism Cement Installed Capacity

5.6 MTPA installed cement capacity.

Prism Cement Supply Agreements

Supply agreements with four grinding units for an aggregate capacity of 1.37 MTPA.

H&R Johnson Tiles Manufacturing Capacity

Total ~64 MSM, including JVs.

Prism RMC Plants

89 plants across 46 cities/towns.

Tailwinds

Cement Demand Outlook

Stable medium-term cement demand outlook in Central India, supported by rural and semi-urban housing and infrastructure development.

RMC Sector Demand Recovery

Beneficiary of demand recovery from real estate and infrastructure sectors.

Deleveraging

Effective net debt reduced to ₹646 crore at FY26 end, strengthening financial position.

Cost Management (Cement)

Disciplined cost management supported strong full-year performance, with FY26 EBITDA per tonne increasing.

Headwinds

Cement Competition

Recent/upcoming capacity additions in Central India by other cement companies to intensify competition.

H&R Johnson Morbi Disruptions

Tile operations at Morbi impacted by disruptions arising from the Middle East crisis in Q4 FY26.

H&R Johnson Inventory Drawdown

Q1 FY27 may see a temporary slowdown reflecting unhealthy lower inventory levels following the Q4 drawdown.

Trade Receivables Pressure (RMC)

Challenging operating environment included pressure on trade receivables in the RMC business.

Risk radar

Intensified Competition

Upcoming cement capacity additions in Central India could intensify competition, impacting pricing and volumes.

Supply Chain Disruptions

Geopolitical events (Middle East crisis) can impact operations and inventory levels, as seen in Morbi tile operations.

Working Capital Management

Pressure on trade receivables in the RMC business could impact cash flow and profitability.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is essential for assessing annual growth and performance trends in a cyclical sector like building materials. QoQ comparison is critical for evaluating sequential momentum and the immediate impact of specific events like the cement plant shutdown and HRJ's inventory dynamics.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Consolidated Revenue

FY26: ₹7,404 crore (+8.4% YoY); Q4 FY26: ₹2,118 crore (+7.7% YoY)

Consolidated EBITDA

FY26: ₹693 crore (+52.1% YoY); Q4 FY26: ₹175 crore (-11.4% YoY)

Consolidated EBITDA Margin

FY26: 9.4% (vs 6.7% in FY25); Q4 FY26: 8.3% (vs 10.0% in Q4 FY25)

Effective Net Debt

Reduced to ₹646 crore at FY26 end from ₹1,138 crore at FY25 end.

Management forward view

Financial Discipline & Deleveraging

Prioritised financial discipline and deleveraging, alongside continued focus on cost normalisation and operational efficiencies.

Strategic Exit from Non-Core Asset

Divestment of Raheja QBE (51% stake) for ₹324 crore to be utilised for debt reduction and balance sheet strengthening.

H&R Johnson Inventory Rebuilding

Process of rebuilding inventory to a balanced and healthy product mix is expected to be gradual, exerting short-term pressure on Q1 FY27 volumes.

Prism RMC Operational Focus

Focused on enhancing plant utilisation, optimising fleet/pump efficiency, passing on input cost increases, and increasing value-added products.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Consolidated EBITDA Margin9.4% (FY26), 8.3% (Q4 FY26)Sustained improvement in margins, especially in cement post-shutdown impact, and operating leverage in HRJ.
Effective Net Debt₹646 crore (Mar-26)Further reduction in net debt post the receipt and utilisation of Raheja QBE divestment proceeds.
H&R Johnson Capacity Utilisation~66.2% (FY26)Improvement in utilisation levels and successful rebuilding of inventory to support volume growth and operating leverage.
Prism RMC Mega Projects Order Book Execution~13.5 lakh m3Timely execution of the robust project pipeline and conversion of order book into revenue, alongside improved plant utilisation.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -4.4% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

PRSMJOHNSNweekly · 1Y-22.5%
Latest close ₹118.58 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-0.4%
RSI
41
MACD hist
0.21
52W pos
2%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹115₹129₹144₹158₹17352H52L2025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2025-062025-102026-012026-052026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 41. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~4.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

25U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet6/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
25

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

25/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 5.4%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -2676.2%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 3/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
79.4
PB
3.9
EV/EBITDA
6.0
ROE
5.0%
ROCE
6.0%
FCF Yield
5.4%
Debt/Equity
0.9
MoS
-2676.2%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
25
Previous: 25
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-2676.2%
Previous: -2670.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
66Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 49th percentile of the scored universe and 45th percentile within Industrials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 27/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 74.9%. Key concern: 3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
49th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 45th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 33rd pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
48
watch · capital discipline
Results
27
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 74.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 5.5%.
  • 12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE is low at 6%.
  • ROE is low at 5%.
  • 1/4 recent quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹31.49
-275.8% MoS
DCF Fair PE
2.9
DCF Fair Value
₹4.26
-2676.2% MoS
PEG

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
79.40
P/B
3.88
EV/EBITDA
6.03
Market Cap
5958.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
4.99%
ROCE
6.03%
ROA
0.41%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
-16.00%
Revenue 3Y
0.09%
EPS 3Y
40.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.93
Interest Coverage
3.92×
Altman Z
2.20
Book Value
30.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
5.42%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
503.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.45

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.87%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
3%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.