RKEC
Small CapRKEC Projects Limited
Real Estate
RKEC Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Dec 2025
Bad · 0/100Rev -73% YoY · PAT -79% YoY · margin expansion · +5% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹32.7 Cr | -72.6% | +5.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹6.9 Cr | -64.9% | +4.9% |
| Operating margin | 21.0% | +461 bps | -7 bps |
| PAT | ₹1.7 Cr | -79.3% | +0.0% |
| PAT margin | 5.2% | -170 bps | -27 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
RKEC Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Dec 2025. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
41NeutralSMA20 -29.0% / mo · near 52W low
Technical chart
RKECdaily · 6M-45.6%Technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 36.
- SMA20 falling (~16.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 36 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- 52% off 52W high · 20% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
- Valuation contributes 22/30 to the score.
- Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 1.4, in distress territory.
- Promoter pledge is 78.5%.
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality
Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 8th percentile of the scored universe and 14th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 31/100.
Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 66.5%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 78.5% of holding.
Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.
overall median 67 · Real Estate: 14th pctile, median 61 · Small: 10th pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Weak Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 66.5%.
- ▸Promoter holding increased 2.2%.
- ▸4 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 78.5% of holding.
- ▸Altman Z is 1.38.
- ▸4 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Interest coverage is 1.8x.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 8.20
- P/B
- 0.37
- EV/EBITDA
- 6.54
- Market Cap
- 78.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 11.20%
- ROCE
- 14.10%
- ROA
- 1.72%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 7.00%
- EPS 5Y
- -12.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 26.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 41.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.91
- Interest Coverage
- 1.83×
- Altman Z
- 1.37
- Book Value
- 81.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 4/5
- OCF
- 4.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 3.85
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 66.51%
- Promoter Pledge
- 78.50%
- Momentum 52W
- 8%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.