IP
IndiaPulse

RTNPOWER

Micro Cap

RattanIndia Power Limited

Power

RattanIndia Power operates a 1350 MW (5x270 MW) thermal power plant in Amravati, Maharashtra, commissioned in March 2015. It has a 1200 MW PPA with MSEDCL and sells an additional 28 MW in the open market. The company has a Fuel Supply Agreement for 6.10 MMT of coal and 87.60 MM3 water allocation.

₹9.44
-0.02 · -0.21%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals09 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
33

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
53

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
57

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
5

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -16% YoY · PAT -66% YoY · margin compression · +8% QoQ

Filed 07 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹788 Cr-15.8%+8.2%
EBITDA₹130 Cr-38.7%+2.4%
Operating margin16.0%-700 bps-200 bps
PAT₹43 Cr-65.9%-20.4%
PAT margin5.5%-800 bps-196 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-04T06:59:25.395Z
Management commentary snapshot

RattanIndia Power reports 38% PAT growth for 9M FY25 to Rs. 92 crore, despite a 3.3% decline in total income to Rs. 2,640 crore. Q3 FY25 PAT was Rs. 2.86 crore, a turnaround from a Q2 FY25 loss, with PLF impacted by scheduled overhauling.

While 9M FY25 PAT grew 38% YoY, total income declined. Q3 FY25 saw a modest profit after a Q2 loss, but PLF was impacted by maintenance. Regulatory receivables remain a focus, with partial recovery. The long-term rating upgrade is positive, but operational consistency and full recovery of dues are key.

Growth engines

Growing Power Demand

All India Peak Demand reached 250 GW in May’24, ~8% higher YoY. Expected to grow at CAGR of ~7.18% to 277 GW by FY27 and 366 GW by FY32.

Increased Thermal PLF

All India Thermal PLF during H1 FY25 increased to 71.42%, highest in past decade, indicating critical role of thermal capacity.

MSEDCL Demand Recovery

Power demand increased in Q3 FY25 post above-normal rainfall in Maharashtra State in Q2 FY25.

Tailwinds

National Power Generation Growth

Country observed robust generation growth, CAGR >5% for 13 years, increasing to 7% for FY24. All India electricity consumption increased by 4% till 9M FY25.

Thermal Power Backbone

Thermal coal-based power plants would continue to be the backbone of electricity generation in India.

Regulatory Support for Thermal

Around 64 GW additional thermal capacity required by 2032 to meet growing demand.

Headwinds

Maintenance Impact on Generation

Generation experienced a decline in Q2 & Q3 FY25 due to scheduled annual and capital overhauling of units.

Risk radar

Regulatory Receivables

Company continues to pursue regulatory receivables at relevant forums. Part payment of Rs. 18 Cr received from MSEDCL post Q3 for penalty compensation.

Fuel Shortlifting Penalties

APTEL allowed recovery of Late Payment Surcharge for SECL shortlifting penalties, but balance payment from MSEDCL is still being pursued.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall financial health and growth trends (e.g., 9M PAT growth). QoQ is important to understand sequential operational recovery and the impact of maintenance activities (e.g., Q3 profit after Q2 loss, PLF decline in Q2/Q3 due to overhauling).

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Installed Capacity

1350 MW (270 MW X 5 units) thermal power plant at Amravati, Maharashtra.

PPA Coverage

1200 MW Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL).

Open Market Sales

Additional 28 MW is being sold in open market.

Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA)

FSA with South Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL) for 6.10 MMT of coal.

Management forward view

Operational Improvement Focus

Steady improvement in PLF since plant resumed generation in Dec 2020.

Financial Performance

Company continues to demonstrate strong financial performance.

Regulatory Pursuit

Company continues to pursue regulatory receivables at relevant forums.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
PLF74% (9M FY25)Sustained improvement post overhauling, aiming for FY24's 82.29%.
Regulatory ReceivablesPart payment of Rs. 18 Cr received post Q3Full recovery of balance payments and timely resolution of ongoing claims.
Total IncomeRs. 2,640 crore (9M FY25), down YoYReversal of declining trend and growth in line with power demand.
Plant Availability78% (9M FY25)Improvement towards FY24's 86% post maintenance.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

57Neutral

SMA20 +6.4% / mo

Stock trend: 57
Sector RS:

Technical chart

RTNPOWERweekly · 5Y-32.2%
Latest close ₹9.44 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-2.6%
RSI
50
MACD hist
0.06
52W pos
20%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹7₹10₹12₹15₹1752H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 50. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 rising (~6.0% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 50 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 44% off 52W high · 26% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

33U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation4/30
Growth14/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet2/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
33

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

33/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 8.6%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.1, in distress territory.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -186.1%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
96.7
PB
1.1
EV/EBITDA
13.5
ROE
1.1%
ROCE
6.2%
FCF Yield
8.6%
Debt/Equity
0.8
MoS
-186.1%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
33
Previous: 33
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-186.1%
Previous: -186.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
34
34
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
53Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 11th percentile of the scored universe and 11th percentile within Power. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Altman Z is 1.11.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
11th percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 11th pctile, median 67 · Micro: 8th pctile, median 71

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
33
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 8.9%.
  • 10 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Altman Z is 1.11.
  • 3 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Interest coverage is 0.9x.
  • ROCE is low at 6.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹4.41
-114.1% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹3.3
-186.1% MoS
PEG
4.74

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
96.70
P/B
1.09
EV/EBITDA
13.49
Market Cap
5069.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
1.14%
ROCE
6.21%
ROA
0.54%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
14.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
-3.00%
EPS 3Y
27.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.80
Interest Coverage
0.88×
Altman Z
1.13
Book Value
8.64

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
8.64%
FCF Positive Y
10/5
OCF
372.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.10

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
44.06%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
21%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.