IP
IndiaPulse

SATKARTAR

SME Cap

Sat Kartar Shopping Ltd.

Pharma

Sat Kartar Shopping Ltd. operates in Trading, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹160.2
-5.80 · -3.49%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags24 Apr 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
69

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
73

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 30/100

YoY data unavailable — classification deferred

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹111 CrNDF+23.3%
EBITDA₹15 Cr+66.7%+50.0%
Operating margin13.0%+300 bps+200 bps
PAT₹10 CrNDF+42.9%
PAT margin9.0%+211 bps+123 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Sat Kartar Shopping Ltd. operates in Trading, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 +6.5% / mo

Stock trend: 57
Sector RS: 48
Sector 3M: +0.0% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

SATKARTARdaily · 1Y-10.1%
Latest close ₹160.20 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-2.3%
RSI
32
MACD hist
-2.23
52W pos
38%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹119₹146₹172₹198₹22552H52L2026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 32.

  • SMA20 falling (~9.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 32 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 27% off 52W high · 29% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

69U-SCORE
Growth at Value

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation17/30
Growth23/25
Quality17/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
69

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

69/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 64.9%.
  • Growth contributes 23/25 to the score.
  • Quality contributes 17/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 17/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
15.3
PB
3.9
EV/EBITDA
9.4
ROE
28.7%
ROCE
37.3%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+64.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
69
Previous: 69
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+64.9%
Previous: +63.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
73Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 73rd percentile of the scored universe and 64th percentile within Pharma. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 63.6%. Key concern: Only 0 years of positive FCF.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
73rd percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 64th pctile, median 70 · SME: 87th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
90
strong · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 63.6%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • Debt/equity is 0.03.
  • ROCE is 37.3%.

Trust risks

  • Only 0 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹102.38
-56.5% MoS
DCF Fair PE
42.0
DCF Fair Value
₹456.12
+64.9% MoS
PEG
0.22

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
15.30
P/B
3.87
EV/EBITDA
9.39
Market Cap
261.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
28.70%
ROCE
37.30%
ROA
20.00%
Dividend Y
0.42%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
23.31%
EPS 5Y
70.00%
Revenue 3Y
23.31%
EPS 3Y
70.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.03
Interest Coverage
25.00×
Altman Z
10.48
Book Value
42.90

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
EPS TTM
10.86

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
63.62%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
37%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 201+23.3% vs prev
0201.0Mar 2025: 163Mar 2026: 201FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 17.0+70.0% vs prev
017.0Mar 2025: 10.0Mar 2026: 17.0FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 25.0+30.0% vs prev
025.0Mar 2025: 19.2%Mar 2026: 25.0%FY25FY26
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.