IP
IndiaPulse

SBFC

Large Cap

SBFC Finance Limited

Financial Services

SBFC Finance Limited is an NBFC focused on providing Secured MSME loans to small businesses, with a typical ticket size of ₹5 lakh to ₹30 lakh. It operates with a pan-India footprint across 18 states and 2 UTs, supported by an experienced management team and strong corporate governance.

₹91.77
+0.49 · +0.54%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
21

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
56

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
42

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Excellent · 75/100

Rev +26% YoY · PAT +31% YoY · +7% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹454 Cr+25.8%+6.6%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹123 Cr+30.9%+4.2%
PAT margin27.1%+105 bps-61 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T18:33:11.240Z
Management commentary snapshot

SBFC Finance reported robust FY26 performance with PAT up 31% YoY to ₹451 crore and AUM growing 29% YoY to ₹11,270 crore. Q4 FY26 PAT grew 30.1% YoY and 4.0% QoQ. Asset quality remained stable with GNPA at 2.61%, though PCR declined sequentially.

The company delivered strong AUM and PAT growth for FY26, maintaining stable asset quality with GNPA at 2.61%. Spreads and NIM improved YoY. While the Provision Coverage Ratio saw a sequential decline and credit costs increased, the overall growth trajectory and stable GNPA suggest the core thesis remains intact, warranting close monitoring of provisioning trends.

Current business mix

AUM Mix by Product (Mar-26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Secured MSME79.0%
LAG21.0%
Growth engines

Secured MSME Loan Growth

Secured MSME AUM grew 22% YoY to ₹8,873 crore for FY26, driving overall AUM expansion.

Branch Network Expansion

The company expanded its pan-India footprint by adding 46 branches YoY, reaching 251 branches as of Mar 2026.

Co-origination Model

Co-origination disbursement value grew 16% YoY to ₹122 crore in Q4 FY26, validating profitable origination.

Technology-led Lending Lifecycle

Paperless, multilingual, and API-led workflows are reducing friction from onboarding to disbursal, improving control and customer experience.

Capacity and execution

Branch Additions

The company added 46 branches YoY and 21 branches QoQ, reaching a total of 251 branches as of March 2026.

Tailwinds

Growing MSME Market

The target market of ₹5 lakh - ₹30 lakh MSME financing is a ₹4 lakh crore segment, growing at a 24% CAGR.

High Quality Borrowers

Over 89% of AUM is from customers with CIBIL scores above 700, indicating strong credit profiles.

Risk radar

Declining Provision Coverage Ratio

The Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) declined to 41.64% in Q4 FY26 from 46.21% in Q3 FY26.

Increasing Credit Cost

Credit cost increased to 1.38% of AUM in Q4 FY26 from 1.00% in Q4 FY25, indicating higher provisioning needs.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

NBFCs benefit from both sequential momentum in disbursements and AUM, and annual comparisons for overall growth, profitability, and asset quality trends, especially given the focus on project execution and utilization.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM Growth

AUM grew 29% YoY to ₹11,270 crore (FY26) and 7.56% QoQ (Q4 FY26).

Secured MSME Disbursements

Secured MSME disbursements were ₹3,107 crore (+16% YoY) for FY26 and ₹785 crore (+4% QoQ) for Q4 FY26.

Yield on Loans

Yield on loans was 17.84% (+9 bps YoY) for FY26 and 17.61% (-27 bps QoQ) for Q4 FY26.

Spread

Spread improved to 8.99% (+57 bps YoY) for FY26 and 9.09% (+5 bps QoQ) for Q4 FY26.

Management forward view

Focus on Underserved Segment

Management emphasizes tailored credit underwriting to service underserved, underbanked informal customers with partial income proof and limited credit history.

Granular and Secured Loan Book

The loan book is 94% secured by self-occupied residential/commercial property, with 100% co-borrower requirement, ensuring granularity and security.

Diversified and Stable Funding

The company maintains a diversified borrowing mix from various lenders, supported by an AA- (Stable) credit rating.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
AUM Growth29% YoY (FY26)Sustained growth in AUM, particularly in the Secured MSME segment, and sequential momentum.
Asset Quality (GNPA/NNPA)GNPA 2.61%, NNPA 1.54% (Q4 FY26)Stability or improvement in asset quality metrics, especially given the informal customer segment.
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)41.64% (Q4 FY26)Reversal of the declining trend in PCR and adequate provisioning for potential credit losses.
Spreads and NIMSpread 9.09%, NIM 10.24% (Q4 FY26)Maintenance or expansion of spreads and Net Interest Margin amidst competitive pressures and borrowing costs.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

42Neutral

SMA20 -4.8% / mo

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS:

Technical chart

SBFCdaily · 1Y-16.8%
Latest close ₹91.79 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+0.4%
RSI
48
MACD hist
-0.01
52W pos
35%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹78₹87₹97₹106₹11652H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 48.

  • SMA20 falling (~3.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 48 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 20% off 52W high · 15% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

21U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth15/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
21

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

21/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 12.6%.
  • Growth contributes 15/25 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 5/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.6, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 0/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
29.2
PB
3.1
EV/EBITDA
903.9
ROE
11.6%
ROCE
11.6%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
1.6
MoS
+12.6%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
21
Previous: 21
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+12.6%
Previous: +13.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
56Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 17th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1415 Cr.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
62 docs indexed · 31 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
17th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 30th pctile, median 62 · Large: 11th pctile, median 74

Evidence depth
Financial-only

62 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
35
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • Latest 3 quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1415 Cr.
  • Altman Z is 1.60.
  • Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 1.65.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹45.86
-100.1% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹104.94
+12.6% MoS
PEG
0.39

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
29.20
P/B
3.11
EV/EBITDA
903.94
Market Cap
10103.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
11.60%
ROCE
11.60%
ROA
4.01%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
0.96%
EPS 5Y
74.44%
Revenue 3Y
35.00%
EPS 3Y
75.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.65
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.60
Book Value
29.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
-1415.00 Cr
EPS TTM
3.18

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
52.35%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
27%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 99.3+32.9% vs prev
0125.2Mar 2024: 125Mar 2023: 121Mar 2022: 87.0Mar 2021: 74.8Mar 2020: 99.3FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.