SIKA
Micro CapSika Interplant Systems Limited
Industrials
Sika Interplant Systems Limited operates in Aerospace Components, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, timing is unclear, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Technical trend unavailable.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -10% YoY · PAT -1% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹41.3 Cr | -10.2% | -17.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹10.4 Cr | +30.9% | -10.2% |
| Operating margin | 25.2% | +791 bps | +215 bps |
| PAT | ₹7.8 Cr | -1.0% | -17.5% |
| PAT margin | 18.9% | +176 bps | +9 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
Sika Interplant Systems Limited operates in Aerospace Components, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
Trend score is pending. The candlestick chart remains available for manual review.
Technical chart
SIKAweekly · 3Y-7.1%Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Quality contributes 20/20 to the score.
- Growth contributes 20/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -18.2%.
- Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 6/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
High Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 100th percentile of the scored universe and 100th percentile within Industrials. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 71.7%.
Management behaviour ranks as unusually reliable. Still verify valuation and cycle risk.
overall median 67 · Industrials: 100th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 100th pctile, median 71
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
High Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 71.7%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 0.4%.
- ▸8 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸No major Trust Lite risk flags.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 53.20
- P/B
- 12.47
- EV/EBITDA
- 42.20
- Market Cap
- 1941.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 26.10%
- ROCE
- 35.20%
- ROA
- 20.57%
- Dividend Y
- 0.26%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 22.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 26.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 52.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 62.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.00
- Interest Coverage
- 45.00×
- Altman Z
- 9.58
- Book Value
- 73.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 0.36%
- FCF Positive Y
- 8/5
- OCF
- 47.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 17.19
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 71.72%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 18%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.