IP
IndiaPulse

SINTERCOM

Small Cap

Sintercom India Limited

Industrials

Sintercom India Limited operates in Sintered Components, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹72.2
-1.38 · -1.88%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals06 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
34

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
64

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
61

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Excellent · 90/100

Rev +14% YoY · PAT +960% YoY · margin expansion · +7% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹27.5 Cr+14.1%+6.7%
EBITDA₹4.9 Cr+26.4%+17.6%
Operating margin17.7%+172 bps+164 bps
PAT₹0.5 Cr+960.0%+43.2%
PAT margin1.9%+172 bps+50 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Sintercom India Limited operates in Sintered Components, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -18.3% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: +0.4% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

SINTERCOMweekly · 3Y-52.9%
Latest close ₹72.20 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-3.7%
RSI
38
MACD hist
0.80
52W pos
10%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹57₹90₹124₹158₹19152H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 38.

  • SMA20 falling (~22.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 53% off 52W high · 15% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

34U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation5/30
Growth15/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
34

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

34/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Growth contributes 15/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -208.6%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
140.0
PB
1.9
EV/EBITDA
9.7
ROE
1.4%
ROCE
5.3%
FCF Yield
0.5%
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
-208.6%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
34
Previous: 34
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-208.6%
Previous: -214.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
34
34
29
29
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
64Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 38th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 69.7%. Key concern: 2 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
42nd percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 38th pctile, median 68 · Small: 47th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
61
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 69.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 0.5%.
  • 7/8 recent quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • 2 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE is low at 5.3%.
  • ROE is low at 1.4%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹20.92
-245.2% MoS
DCF Fair PE
45.0
DCF Fair Value
₹23.4
-208.6% MoS
PEG
4.86

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
140.00
P/B
1.94
EV/EBITDA
9.73
Market Cap
200.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
1.40%
ROCE
5.29%
ROA
0.49%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
18.00%
Revenue 3Y
7.00%
EPS 3Y
45.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.51
Interest Coverage
3.40×
Altman Z
2.66
Book Value
37.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.50%
FCF Positive Y
3/5
OCF
6.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.52

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
69.74%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.