IP
IndiaPulse

TFCILTD

Small Cap

Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited

Financial Services

Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited operates in Infrastructure Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹74.48
+0.30 · +0.40%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
31

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
63

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
56

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
43

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 40/100

Rev +9% YoY · PAT +7% YoY · +6% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹74 Cr+8.8%+5.7%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹32 Cr+6.7%+0.0%
PAT margin43.2%-88 bps-247 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited operates in Infrastructure Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

56Neutral

SMA20 +12.0% / mo · near 52W low

Stock trend: 56
Sector RS:

Technical chart

TFCILTDweekly · 3Y-52.8%
Latest close ₹74.48 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-0.0%
RSI
45
MACD hist
1.76
52W pos
7%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹35₹122₹208₹294₹38052H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 45.

  • SMA20 rising (~10.7% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 80% off 52W high · 46% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

31U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth20/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
31

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

31/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.0%.
  • Growth contributes 20/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -18.8%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 1/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
40.2
PB
3.5
EV/EBITDA
2177.0
ROE
9.9%
ROCE
10.4%
FCF Yield
4.0%
Debt/Equity
0.9
MoS
-18.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
31
Previous: 31
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-18.8%
Previous: -18.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
32
32
32
32
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
63Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 38th percentile of the scored universe and 56th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 43/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Promoter holding is only 3.9%.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
38th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 56th pctile, median 62 · Small: 43rd pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
66
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
43
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 4%.

Trust risks

  • Promoter holding is only 3.9%.
  • 1/4 recent quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹30.32
-145.7% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹62.7
-18.8% MoS
PEG
0.76

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
40.20
P/B
3.45
EV/EBITDA
2177.00
Market Cap
3434.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
9.87%
ROCE
10.40%
ROA
3.79%
Dividend Y
0.81%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
40.00%
EPS 5Y
40.00%
Revenue 3Y
72.00%
EPS 3Y
72.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.95
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
2.33
Book Value
21.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.99%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
139.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.90

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
3.85%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
77%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.