TFL
Small CapTranswarranty Finance Limited
Financial Services
Transwarranty Finance Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Average · 40/100Rev +16% YoY · +29% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹4.1 Cr | +16.1% | +29.4% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹-1.4 Cr | NDF | NDF |
| PAT margin | -34.6% | -2139 bps | -550 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Issuer presentation review pending
Transwarranty Finance Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trend score and candlestick chart
41NeutralSMA20 -10.8% / mo · near 52W low
Technical chart
TFLweekly · 1Y-27.2%Technical trend read
NeutralTrend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 45.
- SMA20 falling (~12.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 45 — sideways, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 43% off 52W high · 14% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers
Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 17.8%.
- Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.
- Valuation contributes 4/30 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 0.7, in distress territory.
- Promoter pledge is 47.2%.
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 5th percentile of the scored universe and 11th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 27/100.
Mixed Trust Lite: FCF yield is 18.4%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 47.2% of holding.
Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 11th pctile, median 62 · Small: 6th pctile, median 65
0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Weak Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸FCF yield is 18.4%.
- ▸5 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 47.2% of holding.
- ▸Altman Z is 0.69.
- ▸2 recent quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Promoter holding fell 2%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Intrinsic value
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- —
- P/B
- 2.35
- EV/EBITDA
- 426.39
- Market Cap
- 67.40Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- -12.50%
- ROCE
- -0.38%
- ROA
- -6.91%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- -1.00%
- EPS 5Y
- -4.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 7.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 17.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 1.07
- Interest Coverage
- —
- Altman Z
- 0.73
- Book Value
- 5.20
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 17.77%
- FCF Positive Y
- 5/5
- OCF
- 14.89 Cr
- EPS TTM
- -0.80
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 53.99%
- Promoter Pledge
- 47.20%
- Momentum 52W
- 13%
Financial History
Updated 9/6/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.