IP
IndiaPulse

TRITURBINE

Small Cap

Triveni Turbine Limited

Power

Triveni Turbine Limited operates in the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹670.9
+7.30 · +1.10%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
53

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
81

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
59

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
61

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 42/100

margin compression · Rev +26% YoY · PAT +7% YoY · +9% QoQ

Filed 18 May 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹680 Cr+26.4%+9.0%
EBITDA₹128 Cr+6.7%-3.8%
Operating margin19.0%-300 bps-200 bps
PAT₹102 Cr+7.4%+10.9%
PAT margin15.0%-266 bps+26 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Triveni Turbine Limited operates in the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

59Neutral

SMA20 +28.0% / mo

Stock trend: 59
Sector RS:

Technical chart

TRITURBINEweekly · 5Y+6.3%
Latest close ₹673.20 on 2026-06-09
Bar
-1.0%
RSI
59
MACD hist
-2.02
52W pos
68%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹409₹516₹622₹729₹83652H52L2024-122025-032025-062025-092025-122026-03Vol2024-112025-042025-102026-032026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 59. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 rising (~21.9% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 59 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 15% off 52W high · 57% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

53U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation0/30
Growth17/25
Quality17/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
53

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

53/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Quality contributes 17/20 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 17/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -84.8%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
58.4
PB
14.6
EV/EBITDA
43.7
ROE
27.1%
ROCE
35.9%
FCF Yield
0.6%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-84.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
53
Previous: 53
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
-84.8%
Previous: -82.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
52
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
81Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 93rd percentile of the scored universe and 89th percentile within Power. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 55.8%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -2.4%.

Computed 08 Jun 2026
management-trust-v1
139 docs indexed · 64 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
93rd percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 89th pctile, median 67 · Small: 96th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

139 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
80
strong · capital discipline
Results
61
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 55.8%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 0.6%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -2.4%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹106.12
-532.2% MoS
DCF Fair PE
33.0
DCF Fair Value
₹363
-84.8% MoS
PEG
2.13

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
58.40
P/B
14.59
EV/EBITDA
43.72
Market Cap
21082.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
27.10%
ROCE
35.90%
ROA
13.98%
Dividend Y
0.60%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
25.00%
EPS 5Y
27.00%
Revenue 3Y
20.00%
EPS 3Y
28.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
149.67×
Altman Z
8.47
Book Value
45.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.63%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
111.00 Cr
EPS TTM
11.00

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
55.84%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
66%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 18.9+36.8% vs prev
018.9Mar 2012: 18.0Mar 2011: 12.2Mar 2010: 14.9Mar 2009: 13.8Mar 2008: 18.9FY12FY11FY10FY09FY08

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.