IP
IndiaPulse

VARDMNPOLY

Small Cap

Vardhman Polytex Limited

Consumer

Vardhman Polytex Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹7.27
+0.35 · +5.06%
Quote09 Jun, 12:00 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags02 May 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
30

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
46

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
57

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -20% YoY · PAT -11% YoY · margin expansion · +28% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹64.9 Cr-20.1%+28.2%
EBITDA₹1.7 Cr+185.3%+1427.3%
Operating margin2.6%+502 bps+237 bps
PAT₹0.9 Cr-11.1%+486.7%
PAT margin1.4%+14 bps+106 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Vardhman Polytex Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

46Neutral

label neutral

Stock trend: 47
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -0.7% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

VARDMNPOLYdaily · 1Y+2.1%
Latest close ₹7.27 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+5.4%
RSI
64
MACD hist
0.11
52W pos
54%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹5₹6₹7₹8₹952H52L2025-122026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 64. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~8.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 64 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 20% off 52W high · 43% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

30U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation4/30
Growth8/25
Quality5/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
30

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

30/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 18.0%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 8/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 60.3%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
PB
EV/EBITDA
11.8
ROE
ROCE
28.4%
FCF Yield
18.0%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
30
Previous: 30
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
31
31
30
30
24
24
24
30
30
30
30
30

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 57th percentile of the scored universe and 56th percentile within Consumer. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 39/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding increased 3.3%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 60.3% of holding.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
57th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 56th pctile, median 67 · Small: 62nd pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
39
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
66
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
57
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding increased 3.3%.
  • FCF yield is 19.4%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • Promoters have pledged 60.3% of holding.
  • Interest coverage is 0.9x.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 16.6%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
DCF Fair PE
30.3
DCF Fair Value
— MoS
PEG

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
P/B
EV/EBITDA
11.82
Market Cap
334.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
ROCE
28.40%
ROA
-4.91%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
1.32%
EPS 5Y
9.00%
Revenue 3Y
5.00%
EPS 3Y
21.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
0.92×
Altman Z
2.33
Book Value
-12.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
17.96%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
61.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-0.53

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
37.50%
Promoter Pledge
60.30%
Momentum 52W
24%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.