IP
IndiaPulse

ZENITHDRUG

SME Cap

Zenith Drugs Ltd.

Pharma

Zenith Drugs Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹42.95
+0.35 · +0.82%
Quote09 Jun, 10:02 am
Fundamentals08 Jun 2026 · screener
Score08 Jun, 11:00 pm · v4.2-nightly
Tags24 Apr 2026
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
72

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
72

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
44

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
55

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT -50% YoY · margin compression · Rev +50% YoY · +19% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹93 Cr+50.0%+19.2%
EBITDA₹6 Cr-14.3%+0.0%
Operating margin6.0%-400 bps-200 bps
PAT₹2 Cr-50.0%+0.0%
PAT margin2.1%+63 bps-41 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Zenith Drugs Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

44Neutral

SMA20 -5.1% / mo

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS: 48
Sector 3M: +0.0% vs Nifty +0.1%

Technical chart

ZENITHDRUGdaily · 1Y-27.5%
Latest close ₹42.95 on 2026-06-09
Bar
+0.4%
RSI
52
MACD hist
-0.03
52W pos
34%
Hover for OHLC, volume, and indicators. Use range buttons above the chart to zoom.
₹32₹40₹48₹56₹6352H52L2026-03Vol2025-112026-012026-022026-042026-06
Up bar
Down bar
Volume
Result date
SMA 50
RSI(14)

Technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 52. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~1.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 52 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 31% off 52W high · 29% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Deep research

Valuation, score drivers, trust methodology, financials, and peers

Use these sections after reviewing the decision summary, latest result, thesis, management accountability, and technical timing above.

72U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation29/30
Growth19/25
Quality15/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
72

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

72/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 17.8%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 81.7%.
  • Valuation contributes 29/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 10/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
7.0
PB
1.2
EV/EBITDA
5.4
ROE
26.3%
ROCE
27.1%
FCF Yield
17.8%
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
+81.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
Final score
72
Previous: 72
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+81.7%
Previous: +81.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.

08 Jun 2026
v4.2-nightly
74
74
72
72
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
72

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Trust Score
72Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 70th percentile of the scored universe and 61st percentile within Pharma. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 50/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 70%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-13 Cr.

Computed 22 May 2026
trust-lite-v1
0 docs indexed · 0 concall links
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
70th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 61st pctile, median 70 · SME: 84th pctile, median 65

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents indexed, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
50
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
90
strong · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 70%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 19%.
  • ROCE is 27.1%.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-13 Cr.
  • Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Intrinsic value

Graham Number
₹67.57
+36.4% MoS
DCF Fair PE
42.0
DCF Fair Value
₹234.78
+81.7% MoS
PEG
0.11

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
6.95
P/B
1.17
EV/EBITDA
5.44
Market Cap
73.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
26.30%
ROCE
27.10%
ROA
7.41%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
19.33%
EPS 5Y
82.57%
Revenue 3Y
28.00%
EPS 3Y
28.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.40
Interest Coverage
5.67×
Altman Z
2.62
Book Value
36.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
17.81%
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
-13.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.59

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
69.98%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
20%

Financial History

Updated 9/6/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 92.6-20.0% vs prev
0176.3Mar 2026: 176Mar 2025: 136Mar 2024: 134Mar 2023: 116Mar 2022: 92.6FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.